The plaintiff, the defendant, another company (of which the defendant was the founder and director of) and other subsidiaries of the company entered into a subscription agreement whereby the company would issue convertible notes to the plaintiff. The defendant also issued a guarantee in favour of the plaintiff. The subscription agreement, the convertible notes and the conditions of the convertible notes all contained arbitration clauses, whereas the said guarantee contained a clause which stated the following: “irrevocably submits to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the Hong Kong courts”.
The plaintiff commenced legal proceedings under the guarantee, whilst the defendant relied on section 20 of the Ordinance to apply for a stay of the legal proceedings commenced by the plaintiff and for the dispute to be referred to arbitration.
At issue was whether the action is “in the matter which is the subject of an arbitration agreement” as set out under section 20 of the Ordinance. If it did fulfil the requirements under section 20, it would be mandatory for the court to order a stay of the proceedings.
The judge held that no clause in the guarantee clearly excluded or displaced the mandatory arbitration clause contained in the subscription agreement as the dispute resolution method. It was also held that it is arguable that the non-exclusive jurisdiction clause contained in the guarantee can operate in parallel with the arbitration provisions found in the other agreements. The judge held that as the proceeding brought by the plaintiff is “in the matter which is the subject of an arbitration agreement”, a stay of the proceedings was ordered. The plaintiff was also ordered to pay the defendant’s costs of the summons on an indemnity basis.
The implications of the aforementioned case are twofold. Firstly, it reinforces the pro-arbitration stance of the Hong Kong judiciary. Secondly, contracting parties involved in transactions concerning multiple contracts should be mindful of the contractual inconsistencies that may be brought to light in the event of disputes arising, which in turn leads to parties incurring further time and costs. In order to resolve disputes as effectively as possible, parties should therefore think carefully how they wish disputes to be resolved during the drafting stages of multiple contracts.