29 Dec 2023

(中文) 史蒂文生黄合伙人和顾问律师荣获香港律师会颁授「公益法律服务及社区工作嘉许计划」奖项

(中文) 由香港律师会主办的「公益法律服务及社区工作嘉许计划」颁奖典礼于12月13日在香港会议展览中心圆满举行。今年,本所很荣幸共有三位律师获颁授奖项,以表彰他们在公益法律服务的出色表现:


本所合伙人曾浩贤律师(右四)

本次颁奖典礼很荣幸邀请了终审法院张举能首席法官律政司司长林定国资深大律师香港律师会陈泽铭会长出席并致词。本所合伙人暨香港律师会理事徐凯怡律师亦出席了本次颁奖典礼。为积极推动公益法律服务,香港律师会于2010年推出本计划以表彰和嘉许律师在公益及社区服务方面的杰出成就。


本所曾学铭顾问律师(左一)


(左起)本所曾学铭顾问律师、合伙人暨香港律师会理事徐凯怡律师、与华南(香港)国际仲裁院执行主席、香港国际仲裁中心名誉主席、香港律师会前会长王桂熏律师太平绅士及律师会秘书长朱洁冰女士合照


终审法院张举能首席法官


律政司司长林定国资深大律师


律师会陈泽铭会长


香港律师会副会长汤文龙律师(左)



本所李明茵顾问律师获颁授「公益律师奖 – 铜奖」​

如阁下有任何查询或想了解更多详情,请联络本所合伙人徐凯怡律师曾浩贤律师,或按此查看2023年计划的得奖名单。

 

29 Dec 2023

(中文) 合伙人徐凯怡律师接受《商法》采访分享跨境争议解决的方案

(中文) 本所合伙人、诉讼及争议解决部主管徐凯怡律师,最近接受了《商法》的采访,在10月号的封面故事 – 《双赢博弈》一文中,探讨跨境判决承认和执行的挑战及相关注意事项。

2023年11月10日,香港政府宣布,《内地民商事判决(相互强制执行)条例》及《内地民商事判决(相互强制执行)规则》将于2024年1月29日起正式实施,意味最高人民法院和香港政府于2019年1月18日签订的《关于内地与香港特别行政区法院相互认可和执行民商事案件判决的安排》即将在香港正式生效,令跨境承认与执行更加通畅。

徐律师在采访中探讨了中国企业在面对普通法争议时的挑战, 包括对抗辩式程序和作为事实证人提供口头证据时的陌生等, 并分享了应对方法。她亦提醒了外资企业在走进中国市场时应注意的事项。


图片来源: 《商法》10月号


图片来源: 《商法》10月号

如阁下有任何查询或想了解更多详情,请联络本所合伙人徐凯怡律师﹐或按此查看《商法》的专题报告。

29 Dec 2023

(中文) 合伙人徐凯怡律师荣膺 “ALB 2023 年亚洲诉讼律师”

(中文) 本所欣然宣布,合伙人、诉讼及争议解决部主管徐凯怡律师,荣获国际权威法律媒体《亚洲法律杂志》(Asian Legal Business, ALB)评选为「2023 年亚洲诉讼律师」(Litigators of Asia 2023)。

ALB是汤森路透旗下的尖端法律杂志,为读者提供前沿的法律商业资讯和律所专业评级,被认为是最具影响力的法律媒体之一。「2023 年亚洲诉讼律师」榜单旨在表彰亚洲最杰出和最有影响力的诉讼律师。本次认可证明了徐律师在亚洲争议解决领域卓越的专业实力,和業界和客户之高度評價和肯定。

如阁下有任何查询或想了解更多详情,请联络本所合伙人徐凯怡律师﹐或按此查看ALB 12月刊之报导。

 

 

14 Dec 2023

THE SECURITIES AND FUTURES COMMISSION PUBLISHED THE CIRCULAR ON TOKENISATION OF SFC-AUTHORISED INVESTMENT PRODUCTS

On 2 November 2023, the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong (the “SFC”) issued a circular (the “Circular”) regarding the tokenisation of SFC-authorised investment products for offering to the public in Hong Kong. 

Background 

Tokenisation of investment products is a process that leverages blockchain technology to represent ownership in traditional investment assets, such as real estate, stocks, bonds, or funds, through digital tokens.  Please also see our news update in relation to the Guide to Digital Assets and Tokens in Hong Kong.  These tokens are created on a blockchain network and serve as digital representations of the underlying assets, made available directly to individual investors, distributed by the intermediaries who are licensed by the SFC, or traded among the blockchain participants, in accordance with applicable regulations.

In Hong Kong, certain stakeholders have already initiated or are actively exploring the tokenisation of securities and other investment products in which the tokenisation is expected to be capable of enhancing product efficiency, lowering operational expenses by decreasing dependence on intermediaries, and accessing the end-investors through new channels.

To meet market demand and support the growth of the market, the SFC has been evaluating different suggestions related to the tokenisation of investment products.  These proposals encompass a range of activities, including primary transactions involving tokenised products such as subscriptions and redemptions, as well as secondary trading of tokenised products on virtual asset trading platforms licensed by the SFC.  The SFC believes that employing a see-through approach is suitable to permit primary dealing of tokenised SFC-authorised investment products.  Nevertheless, this is contingent upon the underlying product meeting all the relevant requirements for product authorisation and the implementation of additional safeguards to address the potential risks associated with the tokenisation arrangement.

Conversely, the secondary trading of SFC-authorised investment products that have been tokenised requires greater caution and meticulous evaluation to ensure that investors receive a level of protection that is substantially equivalent to that provided for non-tokenised products.  Several factors need to be considered, including maintaining accurate and immediate records of token ownership, the preparedness of trading infrastructure and market participants to facilitate liquidity, and the equitable pricing of tokenised products, among other considerations.

Guidelines pertaining to the primary dealing of tokenised SFC-authorised investment products 

Product providers of tokenised SFC-authorised investment products must ensure that the underlying products comply with the applicable requirements outlined in relevant rules, regulations and product codes.  These requirements encompass various aspects, including the eligibility of product providers, product structure, investment and operational criteria, disclosure obligations, and ongoing compliance responsibilities.  In addition, requirements in the Circular on intermediaries engaging in tokenised securities-related activities released by the SFC on 2 November 2023 (the “Tokenised Securities Circular”) should also be satisfied (please see our news update on the Tokenised Securities Circular). 

1.      Tokenisation arrangement

Considering that tokenised products are publicly offered in Hong Kong and the significance of accurately reflecting investors’ ownership through proper records, product providers have a ultimate responsibility for the management and operational soundness of the tokenisation arrangement adopted, as well as the accurate record-keeping of ownership, regardless of any outsourcing arrangements.  They should ensure the proper maintenance of records regarding token holders’ ownership interests in the product, while ensuring operational compatibility with the involved service providers.  Further, they must also implement suitable measures to identify, manage, and mitigate cybersecurity risks, ensure data privacy, address system outages and recovery, and maintain a comprehensive and robust business continuity plan.

When utilising blockchain networks, product providers should avoid using public-permissionless networks without adequate controls. Instead, they should impose additional control by employing a permissioned token.  Product Providers are required to, confirm and, when requested by the SFC, demonstrate to the satisfaction of the SFC the management and operational soundness of the tokenisation arrangement, record-keeping of ownership, and the integrity of smart contracts.

Upon request from the SFC, product providers should obtain third-party audits or verifications to assess the management and operational soundness of the tokenisation arrangement, record-keeping of ownership, and integrity of smart contracts.  Furthermore, product providers should obtain satisfactory legal opinions to support their applications upon SFC’s request.

2.      Disclosure

The offering documents for a tokenised SFC-authorised investment product should provide clear information on the following:

(i)               the tokenisation arrangement, including explicit disclosure regarding whether off-chain or on-chain settlement is considered final;

(ii)              the ownership representation of the tokens, such as details about legal and beneficial title, as well as ownership of or interests in the product; and

(iii)             the risks associated with the tokenisation arrangement, for instance, cybersecurity vulnerabilities, system outages, the potential existence of undiscovered technical flaws, the evolving regulatory landscape, and potential challenges related to the application of existing laws.

For more disclosure requirements, please also refer to paragraphs 19 to 20 of the Tokenised Securities Circular.

3.      Intermediaries and staff competence

Distributors of tokenised SFC-authorised investment products as well as product providers who distribute their own products must be regulated intermediaries such as SFC-licensed corporations or registered institutions.  They are required to adhere to the relevant requirements outlined in existing rules, codes, and guidelines.  This includes meeting obligations related to client onboarding requirements and conducting suitability assessments on their investors.  Product providers are also required to provide confirmation to the SFC that they have at least one competent staff member with relevant experience and expertise to operate and/or supervise the tokenisation arrangement and to manage the new risks associated with ownership and technology in an appropriate manner.

Prior consultation and approval

For investment products with tokenisation features that intend to seek authorisation from the SFC, prior consultation with the SFC is necessary. The same applies to the tokenisation of existing SFC-authorised investment products, which may require prior approval, for instance, approval should be obtained before adding the disclosure of new tokenised unit/share class of an SFC-authorised fund in the Hong Kong offering documents and offering it to the public in Hong Kong.

Considering the dynamic nature of this field, the SFC reserves the right to provide additional guidance or impose further requirements specific to tokenised SFC-authorised investment products as deemed appropriate.

Analysis and takeaway

The Circular sets out the requirements under which the SFC would consider allowing tokenisation of SFC-authorised investment products for offering to the public in Hong Kong.  The SFC’s evaluation of proposals and support for the tokenisation of investment products indicates the recognition of the market potential in Hong Kong.  Tokenisation can provide opportunities for increased market efficiency, reduced costs, and expanded access to investment products for investors.  Also, it may facilitate streamlining of processes and reduce reliance on intermediaries.

While the SFC recognises the potential benefits of tokenisation, it also places emphasis on investor protection and regulatory oversight.  The SFC aims to strike a balance between accelerating the growth of tokenised investment products and ensuring that market participants adhere to the necessary requirements and safeguards.  Ongoing communication among market participants, investors and the regulatory, and vigilance in mitigating risks, would be crucial in this evolving landscape.

Please contact our Partner Mr. Rodney Teoh for any enquiries or further information.

This news update is for information purposes only. Its content does not constitute legal advice and should not be treated as such. Stevenson, Wong & Co. will not be liable to you in respect of any special, indirect or consequential loss or damage arising from or in connection with any decision made, action or inaction taken in reliance on the information set out herein.

13 Dec 2023

THE SECURITIES AND FUTURES COMMISSION PUBLISHED CIRCULAR ON INTERMEDIARIES ENGAGING IN TOKENISED SECURITIES-RELATED ACTIVITIES

Introduction

On 2 November 2023, the Securities and Futures Commission (the “SFC”) published a Circular on intermediaries engaging in tokenised securities-related activities (the “Circular”) to clarify regulatory expectations for intermediaries engaged in the said activities.  This Circular will supersede the Statement on Security Token Offerings published (the “Statement”) by the SFC on 28 March 2019.

The Circular first distinguished between “Digital Securities” and “Tokenised Securities”.  “Digital Securities” are defined as “securities” under section 1 of Part 1 of Schedule 1 to the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571) (the “SFO”) which adopt distributed ledger technology (“DLT”) or similar technology in their lifecycle; while the SFC classifies “Tokenised Securities” as a subset of “Digital Securities”, encompassing traditional financial instruments (like bonds or funds) which are also “securities” that utilise DLT or similar technology in their lifecycle.  Examples of “Digital Securities” which are not “Tokenised Securities” include tokenisation of fractionalised interests in real world or digital assets such that the arrangement would amount to collective investments schemes (“CIS”).

Key points from the Circular

Nature of Tokenised Securities
  • ·        Existing legal and regulatory requirements governing traditional securities market continue to apply to Tokenised Securities
  • ·        Offerings of Tokenised Securities would be subject to the prospectus regime under the Companies (Winding up and Miscellaneous Provisions) Ordinance (Cap. 32) (the “C(WUMP)O”) and the offers of investments regime under Part IV of the SFO
  • ·        Conduct of intermediaries are also governed by existing conduct requirements for securities related activities

 

New risks arising from tokenisation
  • ·        SFC reaffirms its overarching approach of “same business, same risks, same rules” when dealing with tokenisation of securities
  • ·        SFC also reminded intermediaries to manage new risks associated with tokenisation of securities, including:
    • o   ownership risks (i.e. transfer and record of ownership interest in tokenised securities, etc.); and
    • o   technology risks (i.e. forking, blockchain network outages and cybersecurity risks, etc.)

 

Considerations for engaging in Tokenised Securities-related activities Intermediaries should act with due skill, care and diligence, and perform due diligence on the Tokenised Securities based on all the available information to identify the key features and risks

 

Issuance of Tokenised Securities

  • ·        Intermediaries (where they issue or are substantially involved in the issuance of Tokenised Securities they intend to deal in or advise on) remain responsible for the overall operation of the tokenisation arrangement notwithstanding any outsourcing to third-party vendors/service providers
  • ·        Intermediaries to take into account the list of non-exhaustive factors set out in Part A of the appendix to the Circular
  • ·        Intermediaries to take into account the features and risks of the Tokenised Securities in considering the most appropriate custodial arrangement for the Tokenised Securities

 

Dealing in, advising on, or managing portfolios investing in Tokenised Securities

  • ·        Intermediaries to conduct due diligence on the issuers and their third-party vendors/service providers involved in the tokenisation arrangement as well as the features and risks arising from the tokenisation arrangement
  • ·        Intermediaries to understand and be satisfied with the controls implemented by the issuers and their third-party vendors/service providers

 

Information for clients
  • ·        Intermediaries to make adequate disclosure of relevant material information specific to Tokenised Securities (including the risks of the Tokenised Securities) and communicate such information in a clear and easily comprehensible manner
  • ·        Intermediaries to provide clients with material information on the tokenisation arrangement, e.g.:
    • o   whether off-chain or on-chain settlement is final;
    • o   the limitations imposed on transfers of the Tokenised Securities (if any);
    • o   whether a smart contract audit has been conducted before deployment of the smart contract (if any);
    • o   key administrative controls and business continuity planning for DLT-related events; and
    • o   the custodial arrangement (if applicable).

 

Clarifications regarding SFC’s previous Statement on Security Token Offerings Complex product categorisation

  • ·        Whether a Tokenised Security is a complex product or not is based on an assessment of the complexity of its underlying traditional security (i.e., a see-through approach should be adopted in assessing complexity)
  • ·        Intermediaries should determine whether a Tokenised Security is complex or not by assessing the underlying traditional security having regard to the factors set out in:
    • o   Chapter 6 of the Guidelines on Online Distribution and Advisory Platforms; and
    • o   Paragraph 5.5 of the Code of Conduct for Persons Licensed by or Registered with the SFC

 

Professional investors (“PI”)-only restriction

  • ·        The SFC is of the view that there would be no need to impose a mandatory PI-only restriction
  • ·        Intermediaries are reminded that the requirements of the prospectus regime under the C(WUMP)O and the offers of investments regime under Part IV of the SFO would apply to the offering of Tokenised Securities to the public of Hong Kong (the “Public Offering Regimes”)
  • ·        Offer of Tokenised Securities that is not authorised under the Public Offering Regimes could only be made to PIs or pursuant to any other applicable exemption

 

Clarifications of other requirements Fund managers managing portfolios which may invest in Tokenised Securities

  • ·        “De minimis threshold” under the Terms and Conditions only applies to virtual assets as defined in section 53ZRA of the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Ordinance (Cap. 615)
  • ·        The SFC would not impose the terms and conditions for licensed corporations or registered institutions which manage portfolios that invest in virtual assets on fund managers managing portfolios investing in Tokenised Securities meeting the “de minimis threshold” unless the portfolios also invest in virtual assets meeting the “de minimis threshold”

 

Virtual asset trading platform operators (“VATPs”) licensed by the SFC and the applicable insurance/compensation arrangement

  • ·        VATPs are required to put in place a compensation arrangement approved by the SFC to cover the potential loss of security tokens in compliance with paragraph 10.22 of the Guidelines for Virtual Asset Trading Platform Operators.  The SFC may exclude certain Tokenised Securities from the required coverage by VATPs on a case-by-case basis
  • ·        VATPs will need to demonstrate to the SFC’s satisfaction that the risk of financial loss to its clients holding those Tokenised Securities can be effectively mitigated if the Tokenised Securities become lost

 

Digital Securities-related activities
  • ·        Where Digital Securities are distributed on an online platform, it must be properly designed and have appropriate access rights and controls to ensure compliance with selling restrictions which may be applicable to those Digital Securities
  • ·        Digital Securities which are not Tokenised Securities are likely to be regarded as “complex products”
  • ·        Intermediaries to implement adequate systems and controls to ensure compliance with the applicable legal and regulatory requirements before they engage in activities relating to Digital Securities

 

Notification and provision of information to the SFC
  • ·        Intermediaries which are interested in engaging in any activities involving any Digital Securities (including Tokenised Securities) should notify and discuss their business plans with their case officer in the SFC in advance

 

 

Analysis and takeaways

As reflected in the Circular, the SFC acknowledges the growing interest and potential benefits of tokenisation in the financial market.  With more intermediaries exploring the tokenisation of securities and the distribution of tokenised assets, there is a need for guidance and regulatory certainty to manage the associated risks.  By providing guidance on addressing new risks and ensuring investor protection, the SFC aims to foster a healthy tokenisation marketplace.

Please contact our Partner Mr. Rodney Teoh for any enquiries or further information.

This news update is for information purposes only. Its content does not constitute legal advice and should not be treated as such. Stevenson, Wong & Co. will not be liable to you in respect of any special, indirect or consequential loss or damage arising from or in connection with any decision made, action or inaction taken in reliance on the information set out herein.

7 Dec 2023

Stevenson, Wong & Co. advised Garden Stage Limited (NASDAQ: GSIW) on its successful listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market

Stevenson, Wong & Co. acted as the Hong Kong legal advisers to Garden Stage Limited (NASDAQ: GSIW) (“Garden Stage”) in the successful listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market on 1 December 2023 (the “Nasdaq Listing”). Garden Stage offered a total of 2,500,000 ordinary shares, priced at US$4.00 per share (the “Offering”). The aggregate gross proceeds from the offering was US$10 million.

Garden Stage through its wholly-owned operating subsidiaries, are licensed to conduct Type 1 (dealing in securities) regulated activities, Type 4 (Advising on Securities) regulated activities and Type 9 (Asset Management) regulated activities under the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Chapter 571 of the Laws of Hong Kong). The operating subsidiaries are Hong Kong-based financial services’ roviders principally engaged in the provision of (i) placing and underwriting services; (ii) securities dealing and brokerage services; and (iii) asset management services.

Our Partners, Hank Lo and Gordon Tsang, together with Associate Gary Kwok, acted as the Hong Kong legal counsel for Garden Stage in the Nasdaq Listing.

Please contact Hank Lo or Gordon Tsang for any enquiries or further information about this transaction.