7 September 2026

1. Introduction

On 24 July 2026, The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited (the “Exchange”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited (“HKEX”), published the consultation conclusions (the “Consultation Conclusions”) on their consultation paper on the Listing Framework Competitiveness Review. This marks the initial phase of the Exchange’s competitiveness review of Hong Kong’s listing framework, seeking market feedback on targeted reforms aimed at broadening company diversity, expanding investment opportunities, and maintaining robust investor protections.

The proposals aim to reform the existing environment primarily by refining the existing listing framework in three vital areas:

1. Expanding the Weighted Voting Rights (WVR) regime by lowering market capitalisation and financial eligibility thresholds and relaxing certain WVR restrictions to enhance market competitiveness.
2. Altering the regime to support overseas-listed issuers, which includes introducing measures to facilitate overseas issuers’ listings in Hong Kong and lowering the eligibility thresholds for secondary listings. This lowers the barrier for overseas issuers to access the Hong Kong market and strengthens Hong Kong’s competitiveness as an international listing venue.
3. Enhancing initial listing requirements and arrangements to streamline the listing process and improve the protection of commercially sensitive information. This is done by improving the listing pathway for commercialised biotech and specialist technology companies, expanding the scope of confidential filing of listing applications to cover all new applicants, and refining the return mechanism.

2. The key proposals to be adopted

3.Conclusion

The relevant Listing Rule amendments became effective immediately upon publication of the Consultation Conclusions on 24 July 2026.

The reforms hold significant relevance to all companies considering applying for a listing on the Exchange, particularly those in biotech and technology sectors. Significantly, listing applicants are advised to take into account the following:

1. The reduction in the market capitalisation thresholds for WVR companies will enable more mid-sized technology and innovative companies to list on the Exchange with a WVR structure.
2. The formalisation of two pathways for satisfying the innovative company requirement, namely a technology-based route (Route A) and a business model-based route (Route B), provides greater certainty and a clearer pathway for different types of innovative companies seeking a WVR listing.
3. Biotech and specialist technology companies that already meet the financial eligibility tests are given the option to list under the applicable specialist chapters, providing a wider range of choices to listing applicants.
4. The expansion of the non-public filing regime to all new applicants, together with the enhanced Return Mechanism, is expected to provide greater flexibility during the IPO process while increasing accountability among professional advisers involved in listing applications.

The Exchange has indicated that these reforms represent the first phase of its competitiveness review, with further consultations and potential reforms to the listing framework expected in due course.

Please contact our Partner Mr. Rodney Teoh for any enquiries or further information.

This news update is for information purposes only. Its content does not constitute legal advice and should not be treated as such. Stevenson, Wong & Co. will not be liable to you in respect of any special, indirect or consequential loss or damage arising from or in connection with any decision made, action or inaction taken in reliance on the information set out herein.

7 September 2026

1.    Introduction

On 21 August 2026, The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited (the “Stock Exchange”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited (the “HKEX”), announced the implementation of a temporary waiver under which the validity period of eligible new listing applications will be extended from six months to twelve months from the date of submission of the listing application form, subject to certain conditions and safeguards (the “Temporary Waiver”). The Temporary Waiver will apply for a period of three years from the date of the announcement, namely from 21 August 2026 to 20 August 2029.

2.    Key Features of the New Measure

According to the Stock Exchange’s announcement, the Temporary Waiver applies to all new listing applications that satisfy the conditions set out in the announcement, including: (a) listing applications that remained valid as of 21 August 2026 (being the date of the announcement); and (b) listing applications submitted or re-submitted on or after 21 August 2026. To qualify for the Temporary Waiver, the following conditions must be met:

• the Stock Exchange must not have stated in its comment letter that the review of the applicant’s new listing application has been suspended; and
• the Securities and Futures Commission (the “SFC”) and/or the Stock Exchange must not have issued a direct request for information letter and/or a material comment letter to the applicant.

Where the concerns identified in such regulatory correspondence have been satisfactorily addressed and accepted by the relevant regulator before the expiry of the initial six-month validity period, the relevant listing application may still qualify for the Temporary Waiver.

Applicants benefiting from the extended validity period must continue to comply with all applicable Listing Rules and provide complete and up-to-date information, including updated business and financial information, to enable regulators to properly assess each application and investors to make informed decisions. The extension does not alter the Stock Exchange’s existing regulatory standards or investor protection measures. The Stock Exchange will monitor the implementation and effectiveness of the Temporary Waiver and may review the relevant requirements or conduct a public consultation if considered necessary and appropriate.

3.    Enhancing Flexibility and Reducing Repetitive Work

The Temporary Waiver is designed to provide applicants, sponsors and their advisers with greater flexibility in managing listing timetables, while reducing the frequency of re-submissions and the associated burden of repeatedly updating application documents and supporting materials. This allows market participants to focus more effectively on maintaining the quality of listing application documents and prospectus disclosures.

Ms. Katherine Ng, Head of Listing at HKEX, commented: “HKEX is committed to continuously enhancing the efficiency and competitiveness of Hong Kong’s listing regime while maintaining rigorous regulatory standards and protecting the public interest. With the support of the SFC, this extension builds upon the enhanced listing application timetable introduced jointly by HKEX and the SFC in October 2024, providing applicants with greater flexibility in managing listing timelines and supporting a more focused and efficient application process.”

4.    Continuing Listing Reforms and Strengthening Hong Kong’s Position as an International Financial Centre

The extension of the validity period for new listing applications represents another significant reform initiative following the enhanced timetable for new listing applications jointly announced by the SFC and the Stock Exchange in October 2024. The 2024 enhancements established clearer regulatory feedback timelines and review milestones, categorising listing applications into three different scenarios. The enhanced timetable was intended to enable most new listing applications to complete the regulatory review process within the existing six-month application validity period.

The latest measure doubles the validity period to twelve months, which is expected to reduce the need for re-submissions and extensive updating of application documents caused by application lapses. It also provides applicants with additional time to address regulatory comments and prepare listing documents.

Throughout the listing application process, applicants, sponsors and their advisers should continue to closely monitor the progress of their applications, promptly report material developments to regulators, and submit realistic timetables. Sponsors are expected to exercise due skill, care and diligence when establishing reasonable timelines, taking into account the time required by regulators to review and complete their assessments. Given the extended application validity period, the timing assumptions under the enhanced review timetable may be adjusted appropriately by reference to the latest progress updates and timetables provided by applicants and their sponsors.

5.    Conclusion

The Stock Exchange’s decision to extend the validity period of new listing applications is a practical response to market demand. In today’s increasingly complex market environment, companies preparing for IPOs face greater uncertainty, and a longer application validity period will help alleviate timing pressures and avoid the need to re-submit substantial volumes of updated materials simply because an application has expired.

The new measure should also ease the workload of sponsors and professional advisers, enabling them to devote more attention to the quality of application materials and prospectus disclosures. Overall, the change reflects market realities and further enhances Hong Kong’s competitive position as an efficient, sophisticated and internationally recognised financial centre.

The introduction of the Temporary Waiver marks another important step by HKEX in refining its listing framework and strengthening market competitiveness. It is expected to have a positive and far-reaching impact on Hong Kong’s IPO market.

Please contact our Partner Mr. Rodney Teoh for any enquiries or further information.

This news update is for information purposes only. Its content does not constitute legal advice and should not be treated as such. Stevenson, Wong & Co. will not be liable to you in respect of any special, indirect or consequential loss or damage arising from or in connection with any decision made, action or inaction taken in reliance on the information set out herein.

We are pleased to announce that our Partner, Kenneth Leung, has been named in the Asian Legal Business (ALB) Hong Kong Rising Stars 2026, recognising outstanding young legal practitioners in Hong Kong.

The annual ALB Hong Kong Rising Stars list recognises the achievements of the next generation of legal talent under the age of 40. Candidates are considered on the strength and complexity of their work, client feedback and their contribution to the wider legal profession.

Kenneth is a Partner in our Litigation & Dispute Resolution and Regulatory Enforcement & Compliance practices. He has extensive experience in complex commercial disputes and regulatory matters, with a particular focus on advising and representing corporations and financial institutions in contentious regulatory investigations, enforcement proceedings and related advisory matters.

Kenneth’s inclusion in the ALB Hong Kong Rising Stars 2026 recognises his strong legal and commercial judgement, professionalism and commitment to client service, as well as his expertise in navigating complex disputes and regulatory matters.

View the full-list of the ALB HK Rising Stars 2026 here.

Please contact our Partner Kenneth Leung for any enquiries or further information.

China’s securities regulator has fired its most significant shot yet in a years-long campaign against unlicensed cross-border brokerages. On 22 May 2026, the China Securities Regulatory Commission (“CSRC”), acting jointly with seven other government departments, announced it would impose firm and decisive enforcement action against (坚决予以打击)[1] three of the region’s most prominent online brokers:

• Tiger Brokers (NZ) Limited;
• Futu Securities International (Hong Kong) Limited; and
• Longbridge Securities (Hong Kong) Limited.

These coordinated actions — resulting in proposed penalties exceeding RMB 2.3 billion (~HK$2.67 billion), a mandatory two-year wind-down of mainland-facing operations, and a parallel Hong Kong regulatory response from the Securities and Futures Commission (“SFC”) — underscore Beijing’s determination to close unlicensed cross-border brokerage channels and reassert control over cross-border capital flows.

In this newsletter, our Regulatory Enforcement and Compliance team provides an overview of the CSRC’s findings, the mechanics of the rectification scheme, the SFC’s parallel action, and the critical takeaways for brokers, asset managers, and fintech platforms operating across the Hong Kong–Mainland border.

1. CSRC’s position

On 22 May 2026, the CSRC announced it would impose firm and decisive enforcement action against on Tiger Brokers (NZ), Futu Securities International (Hong Kong), and Longbridge Securities (Hong Kong) for “illegally conducting securities business within China”, stating their activities violated China’s securities, funds and futures laws and disrupted market order (破坏了市场秩序).

Specifically, the CSRC found that the three firms had, without mainland licenses, solicited mainland investors, executed trades, and offered fund and futures brokerage services in breach of the PRC Securities Law. The CSRC formally opened cases against both onshore and offshore entities of all three firms.

The CSRC’s announcement can be accessed here.

The penalties are significant. The CSRC proposed roughly 2.3 billion yuan (HK$2.67 billion) in confiscations and fines against the two firms and their founders, penalizing them for providing securities marketing and order-processing services on the mainland without the required licenses. The heaviest impact falls on their mainland client base. Drawing on end-of-2025 figures, the two firms are expected to wind down roughly 570,000 to 630,000 mainland-funded accounts over the coming two years, collectively holding between US$27 billion and US$29 billion in assets.

This enforcement action did not arise in isolation but represents the culmination of a multi-year regulatory campaign. The CSRC first flagged the issue in October 2021 and then formally acted on 30 December 2022[2], finding that Futu and Tiger Brokers had been operating a cross-border securities brokerage business for mainland residents without the requisite CSRC licence or approval. The CSRC accordingly ordered both firms to stop onboarding new mainland clients, though existing account holders were still permitted to trade and withdraw funds.

In response, Futu and Tiger withdrew their apps from mainland app stores in mid-2023, and by September 2023 the CSRC told brokerages based in offshore jurisdictions such as Hong Kong to stop offering securities trading accounts to new mainland investors, according to a Sept. 28 notice issued by its Shanghai unit. Compliance gaps persisted over the following two years, and a parallel 2026 Securities and Futures Commission review of 12 licensed brokers uncovered continued weaknesses, including inadequate due diligence on account opening documents, acceptance of forged or questionable documentation, and insufficient verification of clients’ cross-border correspondent relationships.[3]

2. The Legal Mechanism — Two-Year Rectification Plan

Alongside the enforcement action, the CSRC and seven other government departments jointly issued the “Implementation Plan for the Comprehensive Rectification of Illegal Cross-Border Securities, Futures and Fund Business Activities”[4], approved at the State Council level. The plan sets a two-year rectification period (集中整治期) to wind down existing illegal business, rather than terminate it outright.

During this period, affected brokers may only process sell orders and withdrawals — no new purchases, deposits, or account openings for mainland ID holders are permitted, and existing services cannot be expanded. Longbridge and Futu have already implemented these restrictions from 12 June 2026. Once the two years lapse, all mainland-facing platforms, apps, and servers must be fully shut down.

3. Parallel Hong Kong Regulatory Action

Crucially, this was never solely a Mainland story. On the same day as the CSRC’s announcement, the SFC issued its own circular to all licensed corporations[5], referencing the CSRC’s rectification plan directly. The circular followed the SFC’s review of 12 licensed brokers, which uncovered “significant deficiencies” in account-opening due diligence and ongoing monitoring of cross-border correspondent relationships with overseas intermediaries. Some brokers had accepted questionable or forged client documents, with certain accounts later linked to suspicious fund transfers involving no genuine trading activity.

4. Practical Takeaways for Clients

For SFC-licensed brokers and intermediaries, the priority is a targeted internal review: assess account-opening and beneficial-ownership verification processes for Mainland clients, verify with the clients at issue any accounts opened with questionable documentation, dormant zero-balance accounts, or accounts showing red flags such as shared addresses or bank accounts across unrelated clients. Firms should implement the SFC’s required investor declarations confirming that Mainland clients’ funds originate from lawful sources outside the Mainland. [6]

For asset managers and fintech platforms, this is a prompt to reassess any indirect subscription arrangements, nominee accounts, or omnibus structures that could be characterised as facilitating circumvention of PRC foreign exchange controls, even where the platform has no direct Mainland licensing exposure.

The SFC circular confirms that cross-border introducer arrangements do not dilute accountability, and that breaches of overseas regulatory requirements — including the CSRC’s own rules — may independently constitute a breach of paragraph 12 of the Code of Conduct, exposing licensees to SFC action regardless of the outcome of Mainland proceedings.

Non-compliance carries real consequences: the SFC has stated it has “zero tolerance” for forged documentation, and has warned it may impose external look-back reviews, restrictive licensing conditions under section 116(6) of the SFO, and formal enforcement action affecting a firm’s fitness and properness. Material breaches must also be self-reported to the SFC under paragraph 12.5(a) of the Code of Conduct.

More broadly, all cross-border businesses should treat this as a signal to strengthen senior management oversight of cross-border compliance controls on an ongoing basis, not as a one-off remediation exercise.

If you have any questions or would like to understand how these regulatory developments may impact your business or compliance obligations, please reach out to our Partner Kenneth Leung or our Associate Ronnie Tse.

This article is for information purposes only. Its content does not constitute legal advice and should not be treated as such. Stevenson, Wong & Co. will not be liable to you in respect of any special, indirect or consequential loss or damage arising from or in connection with any decision made, action or inaction taken in reliance on the information set out herein.

[1] China Securities Regulatory Commission. (2026, May 22). 证监会严肃查处老虎等机构非法跨境展业案件 (CSRC sternly investigates and punishes illegal cross-border business activities by Tiger and other institutions).

[2] China Securities Regulatory Commission. (2022, December 30). 中国证监会推进富途控股、老虎证券非法跨境展业整治工作 (CSRC advances the rectification of illegal cross-border business activities by Futu Holdings and Tiger Brokers).

[3] Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong. (2026, May 22). Circular to licensed corporations: Expected controls for account opening and maintaining relationships with clients (Ref. No. 26EC29).

[4] China Securities Regulatory Commission. (2026, May 22). 关于印发《综合整治非法跨境证券期货基金经营活动实施方案》的通知 (Notice on the issuance of the “Implementation plan for comprehensive rectification of illegal cross-border securities, futures, and fund business activities”)

[5] Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong. (2026, May 22). Circular to licensed corporations: Expected controls for account opening and maintaining relationships with clients

[6] Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong. (2026, May 22). Deficiencies identified in the Review and standards expected of licensed corporations (Appendix B).

28 July 2026

1.    Introduction

On 24 July 2026, The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited (the “Exchange”) (wholly-owned subsidiary of HKEX) published a guidance letter (HKEX-GL122-26) to provide clarity on the potential implications under the Listing Rules for new listing applicants and listed issuers engaging in digital asset-related activities, covering continuing obligations and disclosure requirements.

Against the backdrop of rapid technological innovation in global financial markets, the Exchange has observed a growing number of listed issuers involved in digital asset-related activities or exploring such initiatives, ranging from investments in digital assets and stablecoin issuance to tokenisation and the creation of blockchain-based platforms.

While acknowledging the transformative potential of digital assets to bring tangible benefits to the real economy and financial markets, the Exchange remains committed to safeguarding investor confidence and protecting the interests of the investing public.

2.    Definition of “Digital Assets”

The definition of “digital assets” is not exclusive, but the Exchange gave some examples that “digital assets” are defined as assets that:

• are digital representations of value;
• depend primarily on cryptography and distributed ledger technology or similar technologies; and
• can be used for payment or investment purposes or to access goods or services.

Examples include tokenised real-world assets (including traditional financial instruments), stablecoins, and cryptoassets such as Bitcoin.  While the Exchange caveated that this definition is used solely to explain Listing Rules implications, we note that such definition is generally consistent with those as seen in other Hong Kong regulatory regimes.

3.    Suitability for Listing / Continued Listing

• New Listing Applicants

Companies that primarily adopt an operating model similar to a “digital asset treasury company” (DAT), i.e., their principal business involves buying and holding digital assets, will unlikely be considered suitable for listing under Chapter 8 of the Listing Rules.  By contrast, SFC-authorised exchange-traded funds investing in digital assets may be listed under Chapter 20.

• Existing Listed Issuers

Issuers have a continuing obligation to maintain a business that is substantive, viable and sustainable.  If an issuer adopts a DAT‑like model, holding digital assets unrelated to its operations, or holding digital assets without any substantive business, it will likely be regarded as lacking sufficient operations under Rule 13.24(1) of the Listing Rules.

• Cash Companies

Issuers whose assets consist wholly or substantially of cash and/or short-term investments are regarded as “cash companies” and are not suitable for listing (see Rule 14.82 of the Listing Rules).  Digital assets held for investment purposes will likely fall within the scope of “cash and/or short-term investments”.  If an issuer is found to be a cash company, trading in its securities will be suspended.

• Circumvention of New Listing Requirements

Where an issuer acquires a business holding substantial digital assets and its existing principal business becomes immaterial after the transaction, the Exchange may treat the transaction as a reverse takeover, requiring the issuer to comply with all new listing requirements.  Similarly, large‑scale issues of new securities for cash to acquire or develop a new business may be viewed as an attempt to circumvent the new listing requirements, and the Exchange may not grant listing approval for the shares to be issued.

4.    Notifiable and Connected Transactions

Acquisitions or disposals of digital assets are generally considered transactions under Chapters 14 (Notifiable Transactions) and 14A (Connected Transactions) of the Listing Rules, regardless of whether they are conducted for investment, treasury or distribution purposes.

Issuers must comply with applicable disclosure and shareholder approval requirements based on transaction size and observe the aggregation rules for transactions involving the same type of digital assets conducted within a 12‑month period.

The Exchange reiterated that advance “blanket approvals” without key transaction terms are generally not acceptable, as shareholders would not have sufficient information to make an informed voting decision.  Proposals with key terms will be examined cautiously, and those exhibiting abuses or non‑compliance will not be accepted.

A notable clarification from the Exchange is that acquisitions or disposals of digital assets classified as cash or cash equivalents, namely central bank digital currencies (CBDC) or “other regulated digital monetary value that is authorised or prudentially supervised, designed primarily for payment/settlement and redeemable at par in fiat currency”, will not normally be treated as notifiable transactions.  Remarkably, the Exchange has confirmed in this Guidance Letter that an example of such digital representation of monetary value in Hong Kong is any stablecoin whose issuance is authorised by a licence granted under the Stablecoins Ordinance (Cap. 656 of the Laws of Hong Kong).

5.    Recommended Disclosure

The Exchange stresses that any disclosure relating to digital asset‑related activities must be accurate, complete in all material respects, and not misleading or deceptive.  Disclosure is not required solely because an issuer engages in such activities.  However, where disclosure is otherwise required under the Listing Rules, other laws or regulations, or made voluntarily, issuers should include the following information (to the extent relevant):

• Description: Detailed description of the activities and underlying operations;
• Strategy: Board explanation of why the proposal is in the interests of the issuer and shareholders, and expected source of funding;
• Expertise: Management’s expertise and experience in managing the proposed activities;
• Risks: Material risks and associated mitigation measures;
• RMIC: Risk management and internal control systems (custody, security, monitoring);
• Compliance: Applicable legal and regulatory requirements and confirmation of compliance; and
• Timeline: Key milestones and expected completion date.

The Exchange also requires additional specific disclosures on:

• Acquisition of digital assets: If integral to business operations, then the issuer shall disclose specific purposes, breakdown of amount and timing of deployment; If held for treasury/investment, then the issuer shall disclose treasury strategy, role of digital assets, investment limits/caps, and source of funds (including external financing).
• Tokenisation of real-world assets: Disclose identity of token issuer, details of underlying assets (ownership, custody), rights attached to tokens (including redeemability), trading arrangements (marketing platform, blockchain used), and other principal terms.

Issuers should avoid making misleading disclosure or creating unrealistic expectations, particularly at preliminary stages, and should refrain from using generic or boilerplate descriptions when explaining rationale and integration of digital assets.

6.    Other Listing Rules Implications

• Distribution in Specie

If an issuer proposes to distribute digital assets (including tokenised assets) to shareholders in specie, it must ensure fair and equal treatment of all shareholders.  The Exchange will have concerns if the objectives and reasons are unclear, no reasonable cash alternative is offered, certain shareholders are ineligible to receive the distribution, or shareholders cannot readily hold title or realise value from the distributed tokens.

• Continuing Disclosure

When issuing equity securities to fund digital asset acquisitions, the announcement must include the recommended disclosure set out above.  Issuers must report on use of proceeds in subsequent annual reports, including details of digital assets acquired and their purposes.  If a particular digital asset holding represents 5% or more of the issuer’s total assets at year‑end, the annual report disclosure requirements for significant investments apply.

7.    RMIC

Issuers are reminded to establish and maintain adequate risk management and internal control (RMIC) systems.  For digital asset‑related activities, appropriate RMIC measures commensurate with the nature, scale and complexity of the activities should be implemented, covering:

• Compliance with applicable laws and regulations (Listing Rules, SFC/HKMA requirements, AML/CTF, etc.);
• Delegation of supervision to designated staff with necessary expertise, and setting approval thresholds and maximum risk exposure;
• Due diligence and ongoing monitoring of counterparties and service providers;
• Comprehensive security measures (custodian/wallet arrangements, secure storage of private keys, fraud/collusion controls, backup to prevent single points of failure); and
• Processes to identify and escalate material issues to the board/management, including procedures for engaging professional advisers where appropriate.

Conclusion

We appreciate the Exchange’s clarification on its stance in relation to digital assets. As the classification of digital assets continues to crystallise and gain broader acceptance, the Listing Rules should be applied consistently with reference to such classifications. While there is indeed a difference in how the Listing Rules treat digital assets in general compared to CBDCs and stablecoins specifically, this distinction is understandable given the latter’s “fiat currency” nature. That said, in view of digital assets’ agility and unique characteristics, appropriate risk management and internal control measures are indeed necessary.  The Exchange’s clarity on digital assets is a positive development, and we are confident it will help foster greater innovation and confidence in Hong Kong’s digital asset ecosystem.

Please contact our Partner Mr. Rodney Teoh for any enquiries or further information.

This news update is for information purposes only. Its content does not constitute legal advice and should not be treated as such.  Stevenson, Wong & Co. will not be liable to you in respect of any special, indirect or consequential loss or damage arising from or in connection with any decision made, action or inaction taken in reliance on the information set out herein.

Stevenson, Wong & Co. is pleased to announce that the firm has been shortlisted in six categories at the Asian Legal Business (ALB) Hong Kong Law Awards 2026, organised by Asian Legal Business, Thomson Reuters’ leading legal publication for the region.

The shortlist recognises the firm’s continued strength across a broad range of practice areas and reflects its commitment to providing high-quality legal services to clients in Hong Kong and across the Greater Bay Area. The nominations span both firm-wide and individual categories, highlighting the breadth of the firm’s capabilities and the recognition of its lawyers’ professional excellence.

The ALB Hong Kong Law Awards honour outstanding achievements by law firms, lawyers and in-house legal teams across Hong Kong. Winners are selected through an independent judging process based on a range of criteria, including legal expertise, significant matters handled, client service, market reputation and overall contribution to the legal profession.

The award winners will be announced at the ALB Hong Kong Law Awards ceremony on 11 September 2026 in Hong Kong.

Shortlisted Categories

Firm Awards

• Civil Litigation Law Firm of the Year
• Family and Matrimonial Law Firm of the Year
• GBA Law Firm of the Year (Hong Kong)
• Hong Kong Law Firm of the Year

 Individual Awards

• Dispute Resolution Lawyer of the Year – Heidi Chui
• Woman Lawyer of the Year (Law Firm) – Heidi Chui

Please click hereto view the complete list of nominations for the ALB Hong Kong Law Awards 2026.