News Updates

Find out all about our firm’s latest news updates below. To learn more about any individual item, please contact us here.

6 Dec 2022

Stevenson, Wong & Co. acts for Zunyi Road and Bridge Construction (Group) Limited on its successful US$45 million 3-year Offshore Bond Issuance

Following the US$165 million and US$58.6 million offshore bond issuances earlier in May and June this year, (see our news updates in June and July , respectively), Stevenson, Wong & Co. acted for Zunyi Road and Bridge Construction (Group) Limited (the “Issuer”) in its successful issue of US$45 million 7.5% 3-year offshore bonds due 2025. Pulsar Capital Limited and Shenwan Hongyuan Securities (H.K.) Limited acted as the joint global coordinators, joint lead managers and joint bookrunners for this issuance.

The Issuer, established in the PRC, is a large construction company headquartered in Zunyi, Guizhou province. Its business primarily focuses on infrastructure projects in Zunyi and other cities in Guizhou province. The Issuer has also obtained a broad range of industry qualifications, as well as an entity credit rating of “AA+”.

Our team was led by our partner Mr. Rodney Teoh, supported by team members including Ms. Angela Lau (associate), Mr. Calvin KW Lo (associate), Ms. Jess Chung (trainee solicitor) and Ms. Cheyenne Xing (paralegal).

Please contact our partner Mr. Rodney Teoh and associate Ms. Angela Lau for any enquiries or further information.

This news update is for information purposes only. Its content does not constitute legal advice and should not be treated as such. Stevenson, Wong & Co. will not be liable to you in respect of any special, indirect or consequential loss or damage arising from or in connection with any decision made, action or inaction taken in reliance on the information set out herein.

4 Dec 2022

(中文) 史蒂文生黄出席英国特许仲裁学会 (东亚分会) 50周年晚宴

(中文) 2022年11月16日, 本所合伙人,诉讼及争议解决部主管徐凯怡律师、与<法律顾问李明茵律师黄晊晄高级律师市场及传讯主管杨诗雅一同出席了于香港会所举行的英国特许仲裁学会(东亚分会) (CIArb EAB) 50周年晚宴。前终审法院首席法官马道立获邀莅临晚宴, 并就“仲裁员、司法行政和公共利益:可以同时提及吗?(Arbitrators, the administration of justice and the public interest: can they be mentioned in the same breath?)”为题进行了分享。此外,两位前律政司司长袁国强资深大律师、郑若骅资深大律师、以及现任律政司司长林定国资深大律师和 CIArb EAB 主席方兆文博士亦莅临该晚宴。


英国特许仲裁学会 (东亚分会) 主席方兆文博士 (左三)、华南 (香港) 国际仲裁院副秘书长及董事局秘书李雄风先生 (左四) 和本所徐凯怡律师 (左二)


现任律政司司长林定国资深大律师 (右) 和本所徐凯怡律师 (左)

若阁下想了解更多详情,请联络本所合伙人徐凯怡律师

3 Dec 2022

(中文) 合伙人徐凯怡律师受邀担任2022上海仲裁周之演讲嘉宾

(中文) 2022年11月21日,由上海市司法局、上海市国际贸易促进委员会、上海仲裁协会主办,上海市锦天城律师事务所承办的「2022上海仲裁周-国际仲裁中的交叉盘问—律师、专家与机构视角」圆满举办。本所合伙人﹑诉讼及争议解决部主管徐凯怡律师受邀为本届上海仲裁周担任演讲嘉宾。

本次论坛由锦天城律师事务所主任顾功耘教授致辞揭开序幕,并邀请了来自上海仲裁委员会、上海国际仲裁中心、香港国际仲裁中心、新加坡国际仲裁中心和ICC国际商会等机构的仲裁界专家从不同的角度分享其交叉盘问的经验。本所徐律师以「国际仲裁交叉盘问之Dos 与 Don’ts」,分享了盘问证人的常用技巧以及律师盘问的基本技巧和要点,并通过案例演练加深与会者对交叉盘问技巧的认识。




锦天城律师事务所主任顾功耘教授致开幕辞 (图一),锦天城合伙人、诉仲委召集人兼秘书长蔡城律师作为本场活动的主持人 (图二),锦天城合伙人汤旻利博士分享《交叉盘问初探》演讲 (图三)。


上海国际仲裁中心秘书长及上海仲裁协会秘书长王唯骏女士 (图一) 和香港国际仲裁中心副秘书长、上海代表处首席代表杨玲博士 (图二) 为论坛上半场的分享进行了精彩点评。




国际商会仲裁与ADR北亚区主任黄志瑾博士 (图一)、新加坡国际仲裁中心国际仲裁院理事Chan Leng Sun先生 (图二)、亚洲国际仲裁中心董事Tan Sri Datuk Suriyadi bin Halim Omar先生向此次活动致祝贺词 (图三)。




论坛下半场探讨了《如何撰写一份“不怕问”的专家报告》(图一)和《围炉谈话——跨法域下交叉盘问的实践》 (图二),并由锦天城高级合伙人、诉仲委总召集人岳巍律师发表感谢致辞圆满结束本次论坛 (图三)

徐律师透过线上的形式参与了本次论坛。徐律师表示很高兴获邀以演讲嘉宾的身份参与本次论坛,并期待能在不久的将来与大家会面。


若阁下想了解更多详情,请联络本所合伙人徐凯怡律师

2 Dec 2022

(中文) 合伙人徐凯怡律师参与新加坡仲裁协会(SIArb)40周年晚宴

(中文) 2022年11月30日,本所合伙人,诉讼及争议解决部主管徐凯怡律师参与了新加坡仲裁协会(SIArb)于新加坡富丽敦酒店举行的40周年晚宴。

本次晚宴邀请了新加坡文化、社区及青年部长兼律政部第二部长唐振辉资深大律师(Edwin Tong SC)担任嘉宾。另外,唐律师亦是华社联络组主席和人民协会副主席。


新加坡文化、社区及青年部长兼律政部第二部长唐振辉资深大律师为晚宴致辞


左起: 香港仲裁师协会会长邝志强律师太平绅士,新加坡文化、社区及青年部长兼律政部第二部长唐振辉资深大律师和本所合伙人徐凯怡律师


国际商会 (ICC) 国际仲裁院顾问Ms. Hazel Tang (左) 和本所合伙人徐凯怡律师 (右)


新加坡仲裁协会主席郑裕能律师 (左三) 和本所合伙人徐凯怡律师(左一)


若阁下想了解更多详情,请联络本所合伙人徐凯怡律师

23 Nov 2022

THE HONG KONG MONETARY AUTHORITY PUBLISHED THE POSITION PAPER CHARTING THE NEXT STEPS OF E-HKD

Introduction

The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (“HKMA”) released a position paper titled “e-HKD: Charting the Next Steps” on 20 September 2022 (the “Position Paper”) to set out its policy stance on retail Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC), i.e. e-HKD, and outline its next steps. Based on the findings and comments received from the technical whitepaper titled “e-HKD: A technical perspective” published in October 2021 and the policy discussion whitepaper titled “e-HKD: A policy and design perspective” published in April 2022, the HKMA considers it necessary to start paving the way for possible future implementation of e-HKD. In this news update, we will focus primarily on the development of e-HKD, its legal status, and relevant features contemplated under the Position Paper.

Charting the Next Steps of e-HKD

Set out below is the approach and model envisaged by the HKMA to implement e-HKD as discussed in the Position Paper:-

Three-rail Approach The HKMA will adopt a “three-rail approach”, by exploring the phases to promote and prepare for the launch of e-HKD in Hong Kong:1

  • Rail 1 – laying the technology foundation to suit different design choices and legal foundations for issuance of digital form of fiat currency
  • Rail 2 – deep-dive research on use cases and designs, such as projects on access to e-HKD via e-wallet app, cybersecurity, DvP settlement of tokenised securities
  • Rail 3 – rolling out e-HKD
  • Two-tier Distribution Model
  • It consists of two separate, connected layers, namely, the wholesale interbank system and the retail user wallet system.
  • The HKMA favours the adoption of a two-tier distribution structure.
  • The HKMA would first proceed to develop the wholesale, interbank tier (wholesale layer). The target is to develop a technical foundation that can suit different design choices for the retail layer with relatively little modification further down the road.
  • The HKMA will explore with retail payment market participants whether and how e-HKD can fill any gaps in the existing market. 2
  • Features of e-HKD

    As explained in the Position Paper and the whitepapers, e-HKD should have the following various features:-

    Legal Tender Status
  • The HKMA is currently inclined to the view that e-HKD should be accorded legal tender status, to ensure alignment in status between the digital form and the physical form of legal tender currency/bank notes (issued under the Legal Tender Notes Issue Ordinance) and coins (issued under the Coinage Ordinance), these ordinances will be amended to give effect to e-HKD’s legal tender status.
  • This means, absent any contractual term to the contrary, e-HKD as legal tender, would by law be regarded as a valid and legal means of tendering payment for an incurred debt. 3
  • The HKMA considers that by assigning e-HKD as a legal tender with an unambiguous legal foundation for issuance, public confidence in e-HKD will be fostered. As is the present case of physical currency, contracts allow parties to commercial transactions to determine their means of payment, thus the law would not compel goods or service providers to accept e-HKD as payment, or prohibit a person from contractually refusing to accept e-HKD as payment. 4
  • Cybersecurity and Anti-Counterfeiting
  • The HKMA believes that cybersecurity is of utmost importance to maintain public trust in e-HKD, with the majority of respondents to the technical white paper agreeing that cybersecurity needs to take precedence over efficiency for CBDC platforms.5
  • On the other hand, there is a concern over counterfeit e-HKD. In order to secure the authenticity and restrict the “double-spending” of e-HKD, technology-based measures should be considered.6
  • Moreover, the HKMA suggests criminalising the counterfeit of e-HKD by adopting a digital equivalent of the current anti-counterfeiting provisions to protect and bolster confidence in e-HKD. 7 In particular, it is a criminal offence under Section 103 of the Crimes Ordinance to “reproduces on any substance… any Hong Kong currency note” without the consent of the HKMA.
  • Interoperability
  • With multiple countries releasing their own CBDC, the HKMA considers it important that e-HKD should, so far as practicable, be fully interoperable with other payment systems which would enable the public to make more efficient payments without impediment.
  • Moreover, the HKMA would also consider connectivity and the possibility to adopt future innovations in facilitating cross-platform payment and future development.8
  • Anti-Money Laundering (AML)/Counter Terrorist Financing (CFT) Regulations
  • The HKMA agrees that regulatory and compliance standards would be duly regarded in the design architecture of e-HKD.9
  • In line with the “same risk, same regulation” principle, 10 it also agrees that existing requirements under the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Ordinance and the Payment Systems and Stored Value Facilities Ordinance should apply to transactions using e-HKD as far as possible, with intermediaries being responsible for meeting the AML/CFT requirements.
  • Data Privacy Protection
  • There is a question over what parties (e.g. central bank, wallet operators/banks and merchants) should have access to what degree of information (e.g. user identity, transaction history), and of particular importance is the degree of anonymity vis-à-vis the central bank.
  • The overarching principle is that the e-HKD system should at all times comply with the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance and relevant codes of practice, guidelines and best practices issued by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data.11
  • Privacy and data protection should be embedded in its system design and operation, while ensuring effective AML/CFT controls.
  • Tiered-account Structure
  • The HKMA would take note of the suggestions that e-HKD should come with a “tiered-account” structure, i.e. different levels of transaction/holding limits or functions depending on the level of KYC, to strike a balance between factors such as usability and privacy.12
  • Analysis and Takeaway

    The regulators have been relatively proactive in the Fintech scene, rolling out various new regimes and guidance. With the rapid development in Fintech and VAs, the Hong Kong Government, the Securities and Futures Commission (“SFC”) and the HKMA have consistently strived to set up an effective regulatory framework for the Fintech industry in Hong Kong to prosper. The Position Paper on e-HKD is one of the many examples in this aspect.

    Indeed, the Hong Kong Government has been active in establishing the regulatory framework for the Virtual Assets (“VA”) market, including the gazettal of the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing (Amendment) Bill 2022 to introduce a new licensing regime for VA service providers (“VASPs”) which will take effect on 1 March 2023. In addition to the initial step to allow VA access under the new licensing regime. On the same day as the Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau announced its Policy Statement on Development of Virtual Assets in Hong Kong, the SFC also published a circular on the VA futures exchange traded funds (ETFs) in Hong Kong. 13

    Since e-HKD is a digital form of legal tender, the Government believes the significance of e-HKD lies in its potential to serve as the potential “backbone” and anchor bridging legal tender and VA. 14 The HKMA also puts “DvP settlement of tokenised securities in its pipeline of projects for e-HKD. This would offer settlement efficiency, price stability and confidence to empower more innovations in the field of security token offerings and different types of VA, which in turn increases the competitiveness of the Hong Kong VA market and attract VASPs to operate and settle in Hong Kong. This has the potential of significantly enhancing Hong Kong’s payment efficiency through interoperability and synchronisation with the Faster Payment System (FPS). We welcome such development and look forward to the future enhancement and development of the Hong Kong Fintech ecosystem as a whole.

    Please contact our Partner Mr. Rodney Teoh and our Associate Calvin KW Lo for any enquiries or further information.

    This news update is for information purposes only. Its content does not constitute legal advice and should not be treated as such. Stevenson, Wong & Co. will not be liable to you in respect of any special, indirect or consequential loss or damage arising from or in connection with any decision made, action or inaction taken in reliance on the information set out herein.

    1 HKMA Position Paper “eHKD – Charting the Next Steps” pp. 9-11
    2 HKMA Position Paper “eHKD – Charting the Next Steps” pp. 8, 10
    3 HKMA Position Paper “eHKD – Charting the Next Steps” p. 36
    4 HKMA Position Paper “eHKD – Charting the Next Steps” p. 37
    5 HKMA Position Paper “eHKD – Charting the Next Steps” p. 7
    6 HKMA paper “e-HKD: A policy and design perspective” p. 35
    7 HKMA paper “e-HKD: A policy and design perspective” p. 35
    8 HKMA Position Paper “eHKD – Charting the Next Steps” pp. 15-16
    9 HKMA Position Paper “eHKD – Charting the Next Steps” p. 18
    10 HKMA Position Paper “eHKD – Charting the Next Steps” p. 29
    11 HKMA paper “e-HKD: A policy and design perspective” p. 33
    12 HKMA Position Paper “eHKD – Charting the Next Steps” p. 22
    13 SFC. Circular on Virtual Asset Futures Exchange Traded Funds.
    14 The Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau. Policy Statement on Development of Virtual Assets in Hong Kong.

    NEWER OLDER 1 2 40 41 42 78 79