News

Find out all about our firm’s latest news and activities below. To learn more about any individual item, please contact us here.

11 Jan 2022

Partner Hank Lo Named ALB Dealmakers of Asia 2021

We are pleased to announce that our Partner and Head of Corporate Finance, Mr. Hank Lo, has been named one of the “Dealmakers of Asia 2021, Hong Kong” by Asian Legal Business (ALB). In addition, our firm has also been recognized in the “ALB Asia M&A Rankings 2021”.

About Mr. Hank Lo

Mr. Lo heads the Corporate Finance Practice in the firm. He specializes in capital markets, corporate finance, mergers and acquisitions and representative matters. Hank has significant experience advising issuers, sponsors and underwriters on initial public offerings on both the main and GEM boards of The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited; advising publicly listed companies on a broad range of corporate finance transactions; advising private equity funds, venture capital funds and Hong Kong listed companies on their investments in and exits from companies with an emphasis on China; and providing advice to companies in Greater China on representative matters including property transactions, foreign investment and initial public offerings.

About Our Corporate Finance Group

Our highly experienced corporate finance group has an excellent track record of handling complex transactions of every size. Our clients include public and private corporations, investment banks, financial institutions, direct investment funds and international bodies. Through our network of Interlaw associated offices, we provide clients with access to substantial resources in Europe, the Americas and Asia. Drawing on this network, we can provide a seamless, integrated service that draws together different areas of expertise across countries and continents.

For any enquiries, please contact our Partner Mr. Hank Lo or click here to see the Dealmakers ranking and here to see the M&A rankings.

7 Jan 2022

(中文) 合伙人徐凯怡律师受邀为山西省法学会港澳台法律研究会担任演讲嘉宾

(中文) 2022年1月7日,本所合伙人﹑诉讼及争议解决部主管徐凯怡律师,受邀为山西省法学会港澳台法律研究会2021年年會担任演讲嘉宾﹐向与会者介绍香港在个人资料(私隐)之相关条例和分享实战经验。本次研究会由山西省法学会港澳台法律研究会和山西省政法管理干部学院主办,并由上海市锦天城(太原)律师事务所和中国国际贸易促进委员会山西商事法律服务中心承办。

徐律师在会上透过案例分享,说明了个人资料保障的六大核心原则﹐如收集之目的及方式﹑准确性和保存期等。徐律师亦阐释了新出台的《2021年个人资料(私隐)修订条例》﹐并从规管对象﹑个人资料/ 信息之定义和行政罚款权等方面﹐对香港和中国内地的个人信息保护法进行了全面的对比和解说。

若阁下想了解更多详情,请联络本所合伙人徐凯怡律师(heidichui.office@sw-hk.com)。

7 Jan 2022

Partner Heidi Chui Appointed as SHAC Overseas Arbitrators

Our Partner, Head of Litigation and Dispute Resolution Department, Ms. Heidi Chui, has been appointed by Shanghai Arbitration Commission (the “SHAC”) as new Panel (the 7th Cohort) of Arbitrator, with effect from 1 January 2022.

Established in 1995, SHAC has arbitrated over 40,000 cases involving dispute amount over RMB 200 billion. SHAC received over 3000 registration forms from all over the world. After rounds of reviews, 386 overseas arbitrators were selected, with 68 arbitrators from Hong Kong. The appointed arbitrators are reputable professors, senior accountants, senior lawyers with extensive experience in arbitration, trial, and financial management nationally and globally.

Ms. Chui is one of the few solicitors accredited and listed on the panel of arbitrators for The Law Society of Hong Kong. She is also an arbitrator of Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre, China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission, Shanghai International Arbitration Centre, Shenzhen Court of International Arbitration, Hainan International Arbitration Court (Hainan Arbitration Commission), Nanjing Arbitration Commission, Guangzhou Arbitration Commission, Ningbo Arbitration Commission, Hefei Arbitration Commission and Langfang Arbitration Commission.

She is also an accredited mediator of HKAIC, The Law Society of Hong Kong and a Panel Mediator for Buildings Management Cases of the Lands Tribunal, and a fellow of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (U.K.). She is also a China Appointed Attesting Officer as appointed by the Ministry of Justice PRC.

For more information, please contact our Partner Ms. Heidi Chui (heidichui.office@sw-hk.com), or click here to visit SHAC’s website. 

3 Jan 2022

THE HONG KONG STOCK EXCHANGE PUBLISHED CONSULTATION CONCLUSIONS ON SPECIAL PURPOSE ACQUISITION COMPANIES (SPACs)

Introduction

On 17 December 2021, The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited (the “Exchange”) published its consultation conclusions (the “Consultation Conclusions”) to create a new listing regime for special purpose acquisition companies (“SPACs”) in Hong Kong.  The Exchange also published a guidance letter on SPACs (the “Guidance Letter”).  In addition, the Securities and Futures Commission (the “SFC”) published a Practice Note 23 to provide guidance on waivers of the mandatory general offer obligation under Rule 26.1 of the Takeovers Code for De-SPAC Transactions.

Majority of the responses from the public has generally supported the Exchange’s proposals outlined in its consultation paper on SPAC dated 17 September 2021 (the “Consultation Paper”).  This article follows up with our news update in September 2021 on the Exchange’s Consultation Paper.  The capitalised terms used herein shall have the same meanings as defined in the Consultation Conclusions and Consultation Paper.

The Exchange shall broadly implement its proposals on SPAC set out in the Consultation Paper, with some amendments to reflect the public’s responses. The amended Listing Rules as set out in the Consultation Conclusions and the Guidance Letter came into effect on 1 January 2022.

Key features of SPACs

The table below lays out the key differences between the original proposals and the final SPAC framework to be implemented:

 

 

Original Proposal

Final Model Adopted

Open Market Requirement at Initial Listing

1.

A SPAC’s securities must be distributed to a minimum of 30 Institutional Professional Investors.

Proposal relaxed, the minimum number of Institutional Professional Investors is reduced to 20.

SPAC Directors

2.

The majority of SPAC’s board must be composed of representatives of the SPAC Promoters who nominate them.

Proposal replaced by a requirement for a SPAC’s board to have at least two Type 6 or Type 9 SFC-licensed individuals (including one director representing the licensed SPAC Promoter).

Alignment of Voting with Redemption

3.

SPAC shareholders can only redeem their shares if they vote against any one of the following matters:

 

(a)  A material change in a SPAC Promoter or the eligibility and/or suitability of SPAC Promoter;

 

(b)      A De-SPAC Transaction; or

 

(c)   A proposal to extend the De-SPAC Announcement or De-SPAC Transaction Deadline.

Proposal replaced with strengthened Independent PIPE Investment requirements (see item 4 below) to provide a stronger regulatory check on the terms and valuation of the De-SPAC Transaction.  SPAC shareholders will be able to redeem their shares regardless of how they cast their vote.

Mandatory Independent PIPE Investment

4.

Size of Independent PIPE Investment

Outside independent PIPE investment constitute at least 25% of the expected market capitalisation of the Successor company, or 15% to 25% in the case of Successor Companies with an expected market capitalisation of over HK$1.5 billion.

 

Significant Sophisticated Investment

At least one independent PIPE Investor must be an asset management firm or fund with assets under management (the “AUM”) of at least HK$1 billion, and the PIPE investment must result in this investor beneficially owning at least 5% of the issued shares of the listed issuer following the completion of a De-SPAC Transaction.

Size of Independent PIPE Investment

Proposal requirements strengthened, staggering Independent PIPE Investment size thresholds relative to the negotiated value of a De-SPAC Target adopted:

 

Negotiated De-SPAC Value

Minimum independent PIPE investment as a percentage

< HK$2 billion

25%

HK$2 billion –

HK$5 billion

15%

HK$5 billion -HK$7 billion

10%

≥ HK$7 billion

7.5%

> HK$10 billion

Waiver to be considered on a case-by-case basis

 

Significant Sophisticated Investment

Proposal requirements tightened, at least 50% of Independent PIPE Investment must come from at least three institutional investors with AUM of at least HK$8 billion.

Dilution Cap on Warrants

5.

Overall Warrant Cap is 30%. 

Proposal relaxed:

 

(a)  Overall Warrant Cap increased to 50%.

 

(b)  More prominent disclosure on the dilutive effect of all warrants required.

 

(c)   No separate cap on the warrant to share ratio and on Promoter Warrants. 

SPAC Promoters Licensing Requirement

6.

At least one of the SPAC Promoters must be a firm holding:

 

(a)     a Type 6 (advising on corporate finance) and/or Type 9 (asset management) licence issued by the SFC; and

 

(b)     at least 10% of the Promoter Shares.

Proposal maintained, the Exchange will also consider granting waiver on a case-by-case basis (for example, to accept a SPAC Promoter if they have overseas accreditation that is equivalent to an SFC Type 6 and/or Type 9 license).

 

Funds Held in Escrow

7.

100% of the gross proceeds raised from the SPAC’s initial offering are held in a ring-fenced trust account in Hong Kong until a De-SPAC transaction takes place or the SPAC is liquidated.

Proposal adopted, with a minor modification that accrued interests or other income earned on monies held in the escrow account may be released.

 

Rights to additional Successor Company Shares (earn-out rights)

8.

The Exchange proposed to accept requests from a SPAC to issue additional Promoter Shares, as an earn out portion, subject to the following:

 

(a) the total number of Promoter Shares (including the earn-out portion) should not be more than 30% of the total number of shares in issue at the time of the SPAC listing;

 

(b) the earn-out portion is linked to objective performance targets;

 

(c) SPAC shareholders having granted approval, at the general meeting; and

 

(d) such earn-out portion shall be included in the resolution approving the De-SPAC Transaction.

 

The Exchange will permit a SPAC to issue earn-out rights to SPAC Promoters that are convertible into ordinary shares of the Successor Company, if the Successor Company meets pre-defined performance targets.

 

The Exchange will allow share price to be used as a performance target for the earn-out rights as long as those share price performance targets are:

 

(a)     at least 20% higher than the issue price of the SPAC Shares at listing of the SPAC;

 

(b)     satisfied by exceeding a pre-defined volume weighted average price of the Successor Company’s shares over a period of not less than 20 trading days within a 30 consecutive trading day period, with such period commencing at least six months after the listing of the Successor Company.

Brokerage Fee

9.

Nil.

The 1% brokerage free requirement for the placing of securities by SPAC at its initial listing will be exempted.

Trading Arrangements

10.

Separate trading of SPAC shares and SPAC warrants from the date of initial listing to a De-SPAC Transaction.  The Exchange proposed two options to mitigate the risks of volatility, namely:

 

(a)     Option 1: allow only manual trades on SPAC Warrants; and

 

(b)     Option 2: allow both automatching of orders with Volatility Control Mechanism and manual trades on SPAC securities.

Proposal with Option 2 is adopted.

 

Warrants

11.

The Promoter Warrants and SPAC Warrants are only exercisable after the completion of a De-SPAC transaction.  The Exchange also prohibits SPACs from issuing Promoter Warrants at less than fair value or that contain more favourable terms than that of SPAC Warrants.

 

Proposal modified, the Exchange will prohibit:

 

(a)     with the issue of Promoter warrants at less than 10% of SPAC Shares per Promoter Warrant issue price; and

 

(b)     Promoter Warrants that entitle the holder, upon exercise, to receive more than one share in the Successor Company.  The Exchange will also impose an additional requirement that the minimum exercise price of the SPAC Warrants and Promoter Warrants must be at a price which represents at least 15% premium to the issue price of the SPAC Shares.

Analysis and Takeaways

We can see that the Hong Kong regulators have kept in mind its commitment to investor protection in the Consultation Conclusions.  The new Hong Kong SPAC listing regime seeks to strike a balance between upholding Hong Kong as a leading financial centre by allowing SPAC listings while ensuring high quality SPAC listing applicants and De-SPAC targets to enter into the Hong Kong capital markets and maintaining robust regulatory framework.   

Please contact our Partner Mr. Rodney Teoh and associate Ms. Angela Lau for any enquiries or further information.

29 Dec 2021

Partner Gordon Tsang Interviewed by Thomson Reuters

Reuters Beijing recently interviewed our Partner Mr. Gordon Tsang regarding his views on China concept stocks turning to Hong Kong for listing. Mr. Tsang pointed out that the strengthening control of the US stock market and the proactive reform of the Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX), including the new listing regime for special purpose acquisition companies (SPAC), will reinforce the return of China concept stocks.

Mr. Tsang said that technology companies and start-ups such as blockchain and electric vehicles might find it difficult to be listed through traditional IPO methods. However, the new SPAC listing regime to be launched by the HKEX next year will allow more flexibility and therefore, set an easier path for those companies to be listed in Hong Kong. Mr. Tsang added that, “The returning China concept stocks have greater development opportunities. Not only have they gained high attention and recognition, but also a positive impact on their valuation, stock liquidity, stock trading volume and financing capacity.”

For more information, please contact our Partner Mr. Gordon Tsang, or click here to view the complete interview (only available in Chinese).

24 Dec 2021

THE EXCHANGE PUBLISHED CONSULTATION CONCLUSIONS ON REVIEW OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE CODE

Background

On 10 December 2021, The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited (the “Exchange”) published its consultation conclusions (the “Consultation Conclusions”) as to its review of the Corporate Governance Code (the “CG Code”) and the related Rules Governing the Listing of Securities on the Exchange (the “Listing Rules”). The Exchange has received positive feedbacks from the public on its proposals outlined in its “Consultation Paper on Review of Corporate Governance Code and Related Listing Rules” (the “Consultation Paper”) on 16 April 2021.

The requirements under the new CG Code will be applicable to CG reports for financial year commencing on or after 1 January 2022 with certain exceptions as explained below.  The Exchange will also publish a new set of guidance (the “CG Guidance”) to facilitate issuers’ compliance with the corporate governance requirements.  The capitalised terms used herein shall have the same meaning as defined in the Consultation Conclusions and Consultation Paper.

The new CG Code and amended Listing Rules will become effective from 1 January 2022.

Summary of the key revised Listing Rules and new CG Code

The below table sets out a comparison between the original proposals and the conclusions:

Original Proposals

Conclusions

Implementation

1. Culture 
1.1 Require the board to align the company’s culture with its purpose, values and strategy
  • Adopt
  • The Exchange will include suggestions on the issue of alignment with a list of self-check questions and suggested disclosures in the CG Guidance.
Financial year commencing on or after 1 January 2022
1.2 Establish anti-corruption and whistleblowing policies
  • Adopt
  • The Exchange will provide guidance on the formulation of the anti-corruption and whistleblowing policies
Financial year commencing on or after 1 January 2022

 

2. Board independence, refreshment and succession planning 
2.1 Require disclosure of a policy to ensure independent views and inputs are available to the board, and annual review of the implementation and effectiveness of such policy

 

Adopt, with revised wordings to clarify on the focus on “mechanisms” in place to allow strong independent element on the board, which may cover the following:

 

i.    INED’s recruitment process.

ii.   Number of INEDs and their time contribution.

  1. Assessment or evaluation of INEDs’ contribution.
  2. Other channels where independent views are available.
Financial year commencing on or after 1 January 2022
2.2 NEDs serving more than nine years (the “Long Serving INED”):
  • Independent shareholders’ approval for re-election of Long Serving INED
  • Additional disclosures on factors considered, process and the board or NC’s discussion in determining that the Long Serving INED is still independent and should be re-elected (the “Additional Disclosures”) in the relevant papers to shareholders for the relevant AGM or general meeting (where applicable)
  • Appoint new INED if all INEDs on board are Long Serving INEDs at the forthcoming AGM (the “New INED Proposal”) and disclose the length of the tenure of the Long Serving INEDs on the board on a named basis in the shareholders’ circular (the “Tenure Disclosure”)
Not adopt

 

Adopt

 

 

 

 

Adopt

 

 

Financial year commencing on or after 1 January 2022

 

 

 

Financial year commencing on or after 1 January 2023 for New INED Proposal

 

Financial year commencing on or after 1 January 2022 for Tenure Disclosure

 

2.3 No equity-based remuneration (e.g. share options or grants) with performance-related elements to INEDs Adopt Financial year commencing on or after 1 January 2022
3. Diversity 
3.1 No single gender board (with a 3-year transition period for existing issuers) Adopt, with revised wordings and modification to transition period For issuers: Rule effective from 1 January 2022

Single gender board issuers: 3- year transition (i.e. appoint a director of a different gender no later than 31 December 2024)

Issuers with commitment in listing document:

Appoint a director of a different gender in accordance with such commitments

IPO applicants:

Effective for A1 submission filed on or after 1 July 2022 (i.e. a 6-month transition period)

3.2 Set and disclose numerical targets and timelines for achieving gender diversity at board level and across workforce

 

  • Adopt at the board level
  • Modification to the requirements at the workforce to disclose:

                     i.       gender ratios in the workforce (including senior management);

                   ii.        plans or measureable objectives the issuer has set for achieving gender diversity; and

 

                 iii.         mitigating factors or circumstances which make achieving gender diversity across the workforce (including senior management) more challenging or less relevant.

Financial year commencing on or after 1 January 2022

 

3.3 Annual review of board diversity policy Adopt Financial year commencing on or after 1 January 2022
3.4 Include directors’ gender information in forms upon appointment Adopt Rule effective from 1 January 2022

 

4. Nomination Committee (the “NC”) 
Chaired by an INED and comprising a majority of INEDs Adopt, with modification to also allow board chairman to chair the NC Rule effective from 1 January 2022
5. Communications with shareholders 
Disclosure and annual review of shareholders communication policy Adopt Financial year commencing on or after 1 January 2022
6. Other enhancements 
6.1 Disclose directors’ attendance at general meetings in the poll results announcements Adopt Rule effective from 1 January 2022
6.2 NEDs no longer need to be appointed for specific term Adopt Rule effective from 1 January 2022
7. Linkage between CG and ESG 
Elaborate the linkage between CG and ESG in the Code Adopt Code effective from 1 January 2022
8. Timely disclosure of ESG reports 
Publish ESG reports at the same time as publication of annual reports Adopt Financial year commencing on or after 1 January 2022
9. Re-arrange the Code 
9.1 Rename Appendix 14 to “Corporate Governance Code” Adopt Code effective from 1 January 2022
9.2 Mandatory disclosure requirements set out upfront in Appendix 14 (instead of being in the last part of Appendix 14) Adopt Code effective from 1 January 2022
9.3 Re-organise the structure of Appendix 14 to enhance flow and readability Adopt Code effective from 1 January 2022

 

Analysis and Takeaways
The importance of good corporate governance cannot be overlooked as it is the cornerstone of any good business, long-term success and business sustainability of a corporation. The main focuses of the consultation are to promote good corporate governance standards among listed issuers in Hong Kong, to instill changes in the board’s mindset, to enhance communication between issuers and their shareholders and to encourage further environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosures and standards. The consultation shows the Exchange’s commitment to continue to formulate a robust corporate governance framework in ensuring market quality, aligning the interest of all its stakeholders and adopting international best practices.

Please contact our Partner Mr. Rodney Teoh for any enquiries or further information.

This article has been prepared for clients and professional associates of Stevenson, Wong & Co. While every effort has been made to ensure accuracy as at the date of issue, this document is a general outline for reference only, and is not an exhaustive treatment of the areas discussed. Accordingly, this document cannot be relied upon as legal advice in any individual case and we bear no responsibility for any loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of the contents in this document.

NEWER OLDER 1 2 60 61 62 193 194