News

Find out all about our firm’s latest news and activities below. To learn more about any individual item, please contact us here.

14 Dec 2021

Partner Calvin Lo Invited as a Webinar Speaker Re “Exploring Foreign Marriage and Family Affairs Under Civil Law”

On 10 December 2021, our Partner Mr. Calvin Lo was a guest speaker for a webinar titled “Exploring Foreign Marriage and Family Affairs Under Civil Law” organised by the Qingdao Lawyers Association’s Marriage, Family and Legacy Planning Committee. The webinar discussed the legal issues of cross-border marriage. Mr. Lo explained the restrictions on the enforcement of cross-border family judgements, and “Arrangement on Reciprocal Recognition and Enforcement of Civil Judgments in Matrimonial and Family Cases by the Courts of the Mainland and of the HKSAR” and “The Mainland Judgments in Matrimonial and Family Cases (Reciprocal Recognition and Enforcement) Ordinance (Cap. 639)”.


Our Partner Mr. Calvin Lo

For more information, please contact our Partner Mr. Calvin Lo.

10 Dec 2021

THE EXCHANGE PUBLISHED CONSULTATION CONCLUSIONS TO ENHANCE ITS LISTING REGIME FOR OVERSEAS ISSUERS

Background

On 19 November 2021, The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited (the “Exchange”) published its consultation conclusions (the “Consultation Conclusions”) as to its proposal to enhance and streamline the listing regime for overseas issuers.  The amended Rules Governing the Listing of Securities on the Exchange (the “Listing Rules”) and the new guidance materials become effective from 1 January 2022.

The said proposals received large support from the public.  As such, the Exchange has concluded to adopt all the proposals outlined in its consultation paper on enhancing and streamlining the listing regime for overseas issuers on 31 March 2021 (the “Consultation Paper”) with minor modifications.  This article follows up with our news update in April 2021 on the Exchange’s Consultation Paper.  The capitalised terms used herein shall have the same meaning as defined in the Consultation Conclusions and Consultation Paper.  

In summary, the revised listing regime will be based on the following: 

  • Streamlining shareholder protection standards into one set of “Core Standards”;
  • Relaxing requirements on secondary listing regime for non-WVR Greater China Issuers, (a) without demonstration as an “innovative company”; and (b) lowering the minimum market capitalisation at listing than currently required;
  • Allowing Grandfathered Greater China Issuers and Non-Greater China Issuers eligible for secondary listing with their existing WVR and/or variable interest entity structures to opt for a dual primary listing; and
  • Publishing new guidance materials for secondary listed issuers.

Key Summary of the Revised Listing Regime

The key points of the revised listing regime of Overseas Issuers are set out as follows.  

Core Shareholder Protection Standards

  • One common set of Core Standards will apply to all issuers (i.e. Hong Kong issuers, PRC issuers and Overseas Issuers), thereby providing the same level of protection to all investors.  The Equivalence Requirement[1] will be repealed.  Consequently, the concepts of “Recognised Jurisdictions” and “Acceptable Jurisdictions” shall also be removed. 
  • The Core Standards, largely derived from the JPS[2], comprise mainly the following: 
  1. the notice and conduct of general meetings; 
  2. members’ right to remove directors, requisition a meeting, vote, speak and appoint proxies or corporate representatives; 
  3. the reservation of auditor appointment, etc. to a committee independent of the board of directors of a company or a majority of the shareholders and the reservation of certain other material matters to supermajority votes by shareholders; 
  4. restrictions on the term of a director appointed to fill a casual vacancy; 
  5. availability of the shareholders’ register for inspection; and
  6. restrictions on shareholder voting on certain matters required by the Listing Rules.  
  • With regard to PRC Issuers, the Exchange accepts certain modifications to certain Core Standards (i.e. allowing different minimum length of notice period for general meetings and the use of the two-thirds majority definition of a “super-majority vote” for approving a variation of class rights, amendments of constitutional documents and voluntary winding-up) so that while complying with the Mandatory Provisions, they can also attain a reasonably comparable level of shareholder protection standards to Hong Kong issuers and Overseas Issuers.
  • Existing listed issuers will have to determine if their constitutional documents are in full compliance with the Core Standards.  Otherwise, they would have until their second annual general meeting following 1 January 2022 to make any necessary amendments to comply with the Core Standards.  

Dual Primary Listing

  • Grandfathered Greater China Issuers and Non-Greater China Issuers eligible for secondary listing while retaining their Non-compliant WVR and/or VIE Structures may opt for a dual primary listing if they meet the requirements of Chapter 19C of the Listing Rules for Qualifying Issuers seeking a secondary listing with a WVR structure (which are more rigorous than those applicable to other primary listing applicants without WVR structures).   
  • They shall not be entitled to the Automatic Waivers as they are applying for dual primary listing instead of secondary listing.   Hence, they shall be subject to the full set of Listing Rule requirements, save for those requirements waived on a case-by-case basis. The Exchange will also reserve its right, in its absolute discretion, to refuse a listing of securities of an issuer if its WVR structure represents an extreme case of non-conformance with corporate governance norms. 
  • Grandfathered Greater China Issuers and Non-Greater China Issuers are allowed to retain Non-compliant WVR and/ or VIE Structures if they are subsequently de-listed from their Qualifying Exchange.  The Exchange retains its absolute discretion to impose further requirements on these issuers on a case-by-case basis, considering, among other things, their compliance history with the Listing Rules and any material non-compliance on the Qualifying Exchange.

 

Secondary Listing Requirements

  • Relaxing requirements on secondary listing regime for Overseas Issuers (including those with a centre of gravity in Greater China) without WVR structures by removing the condition of being an “innovative company” (i.e. having the relevant characteristics set out in paragraphs 3.2 to 3.4 of GL94-18).   These issuers shall now be required to satisfy either one of the two of the following requirements:

Criteria A 

  1. a track record of good regulatory compliance of at least five full financial years on a Qualifying Exchange (for any Overseas Issuer without a WVR structure) or on any Recognised Stock Exchange (only for Overseas Issuers without a WVR structure and without a centre of gravity in Greater China); and 
  2. an expected market capitalisation at the time of secondary listing of at least HK$3 billion. 

Criteria B

  1. a track record of good regulatory compliance of at least two full financial years on a Qualifying Exchange; and 
  2. an expected market capitalisation at the time of secondary listing of at least HK$10 billion.
  • The Exchange retains the discretion to reject a secondary listing application if it believes that it is used as a way to circumvent the Listing Rules that apply to primary listing.  The Exchange shall also retain the discretion to apply their reverse takeover requirements, in order to prevent regulatory arbitrage.  In particular, in cases where an applicant for secondary listing was primary listed on an overseas exchange through a de-SPAC transaction which was not subject to the IPO due diligence or eligibility requirements applicable to new listings, it might indicate that the secondary listing application constitutes an attempt at regulatory arbitrage, and the Exchange will therefore apply the reverse takeover test to such companies.

Secondary listed issuers’ conversion to primary listing status

  • The Trading Migration Requirement[3] shall be applicable to all issuers with a secondary listing to make sure consistency of the principles on which Automatic Waivers are given.
  • A secondary listed issuer will be regarded as a primary listed issuer in the case of: delisting from the exchange of primary listing (“Route 1”) and as dual primary listed issuer in the case of migration of the majority of the Overseas Issuer’s listed shares migrates to the Exchange’s markets on a permanent basis (“Route 2”); or voluntary conversion (“Primary Conversion”) to dual-primary listing (“Route 3”).
  • Route 1 – For issuers delisted from the overseas exchange: 
    1. A 12-month automatic grace period available for the preparation of financial statements in accordance with HKFRS/ IFRS upon delisting from the primary listing market.
    2. Automatic Waivers will be disapplied in respect of other Listing Rules upon being delisted from the primary listing market.
    3. Regarding involuntary delisting from the overseas exchange, transitional arrangements shall apply for continuing transactions which are entered into before the issuer’s notification of the involuntary delisting to the Exchange so that the transactions are exempt from applicable Listing Rules for 3 years from the date of the delisting notification. 
    4. In the event that an Overseas Issuer expects difficulty in complying with specific applicable Listing Rules, a grace period may be granted on a case-by-case basis. The Exchange reserves the power to require the issuer’s stock short name to include a special stock marker (TP) to indicate that the issuer is a primary listed issuer under transitional arrangements.
  • Route 2 – For issuers that become primary listed in Hong Kong as a result of Migration: 
    1. Upon the majority of trading in the Overseas Issuer’s listed shares (i.e. 55% or more of the total worldwide trading volume, by dollar value, of those shares) migrates to the Exchange’s markets on a permanent basis over the overseas issuer’s most recent financial year, all Automatic Waivers will be revoked subject to the existing transitional arrangements of Chapter 19C.
  • Route 3 – For issuers that become dual primary listed in Hong Kong as a result of Primary Conversion:
    1. All Automatic Waivers shall be revoked upon the effective date of Primary Conversion and a grace period for full compliance with the Listing Rules will not normally be allowed.

Analysis and Takeaways

The revised listing regime enhances and streamlines the Exchange’s approach to Overseas Issuer listings as a whole.  It clarifies the applicable requirements, thereby creating incentives for overseas issuers primary listed elsewhere to explore possibilities of applying for dual primary listing or secondary listing on the Exchange.  Some of the more restrictive requirements for issuers with a centre of gravity in Greater China have been removed, and it is expected to attract more US-listed Greater China Issuers to seek “homecoming” secondary listing attempts on the Exchange.

Please contact our Partner Mr. Rodney Teoh for any enquiries or further information.

This newsletter is for information purposes only. Its content does not constitute legal advice and should not be treated as such. Stevenson, Wong & Co. will not be liable to you in respect of any special, indirect or consequential loss or damage arising from or in connection with any decision made, action or inaction taken in reliance on the information set out herein.

[1] the requirement that shareholders of non-Hong Kong issuers shall be afforded shareholder protection at least “equivalent to” that provided in Hong Kong.

[2] Joint policy statement regarding the listing of overseas companies” first published jointly by the Exchange and the Securities and Futures Commission in 2007, updated on 27 September 2013, and last amended on 30 April 2018

[3] the requirement under Rule 19C.13 of the Listing Rules that if the majority of trading in a Greater China Issuer’s listed shares migrates to the Exchange’s markets on a permanent basis, the Exchange will regard the issuer as having a dual primary listing and consequently the Automatic Waivers will no longer apply to such issuer

7 Dec 2021

Partner Gordon Tsang Has Received The Gold Award in the Pro Bono and Community Work Recognition Programme for 7 Consecutive Years

We are delighted to announce that our Partner Mr. Gordon Tsang has been awarded the Individual- Gold Award in the Pro Bono Community Work Recognition Programme 2021 for his continuous contribution to community work. Organised by the Law Society of Hong Kong, the award aims to recognise and showcase the commitment of lawyers in Hong Kong to the community. Mr. Tsang has received this accolade for 7 consecutive years.

For any enquiries, please contact our Partner Mr. Gordon Tsang.

26 Nov 2021

(中文) 全球主要市场非同质化代币 (NFTs) 的最新发展

(中文) 自最早发行至今,非同质化代币 (Non-Fungible Tokens)(下称「NFT(s)」) 现在已成为众所周知的「有价值的商品」。然而,由于存在的历史相对较短,大多数国家和司法管辖区尚未充分认可NFTs或加密货币资产 (crypto assets) 的法律地位,也未能提供全面的监管框架。

2021年11月1日,在一款名为「鱿鱼币 (SQUID Tokens)」的开发商携款潜逃后,该代币的投资者遭受了巨额损失,共计250万美元。这一骗案为投资与公众者提供了及时的警告,提醒投资者与公众不可忽视与NFTs相关的风险。鉴于投资者与公众对NFT市场的兴趣日益增加,本文旨在简要介绍全球主要市场NFTs的近期发展概况,包括对于NFTs法律地位的司法认可,以及NFTs在娱乐行业的最新应用。

首先,有必要指出的是,一些国家在一定程度上禁止NFTs或与NFTs相关的交易。例如,中国人民银行于2021年9月24日完全禁止加密货币交易,而印度的立法者正在考虑将持有、发行、采矿、交易和转移加密货币资产的行为定为犯罪行为。

香港

在香港,一般的规管情况是若NFTs被视作符合《证券及期货条例》(第517章)(下称「香港证券条例」) 附表1所列的「证券 (securities) 」的定义,则该等NFTs便会受到香港证券及期货事务监察委员会 (下称「香港证监会」) 的规管。然而,如果此类代币不属于香港证券条例「证券」的定义,则它们将不受香港证券条例的监管管辖。

同时,在民事救济方面,香港高等法院在Nico Constantijin Antonius Samara v Stive Jean Paul Dan [2019] HKCFI 2718一案中已经确认了加密代币的「数字资产 (digital assets)」的地位,并批准了冻结该案被告的资产玛瑞瓦禁令 (Mareva Injunction),其中包括被告持有的比特币 (Bitcoin)。然而,香港法律对于NFTs是否被认定为「普通个人财产」 未有清晰定义。

在2021年8月中旬,一家位于瑞士的第三方资助者(third-party funder)资助了超过700名申请人在香港国际仲裁中心对币安(Binance)(加密货币的主要交易所和交易平台) 开展仲裁程序。该仲裁程序是关于币安今年5月网上交易平台崩盘而引发的争议。该仲裁案件将会为香港法律界及仲裁界带来许多独特的挑战,包括 (除其他外) 将香港单一标准 (香港法作为管辖法律) 适用于解决多个国家和司法管辖区关于有争议的或至少是尚未确定的NFTs交换和交易领域服务的争议。

英国

与香港不同,英国高等法院在AA v Persons Unknown [2019] EWHC 3556 (Comm)一案中已经确认加密资产被视为「财产」并批准了有关原告作为赎金的比特币的所有权强制令 (proprietary injunction)。此后,英国法院一般都愿意向NFT相关的骗案受害者提供标准民事救济,以帮助识别欺诈者和确定相关资金的去向。

除了在法庭上有关NFT的讨论之外,英国Stephenson Law律师事务所更是于2021年10月25日推出了一组三种不同的代币 (其中一种代币将使买家有权与律所创始人进行一对一的会面),成为首家推出NFT的律师事务所。

美国

在美国,NFTs越来越多地被应用于娱乐行业。自从数字艺术家迈克温克尔曼 (又名Beeple) 以6,900万美元的价格成功出售其创作的NFT后,美国娱乐行业对将影视作品的视听片段甚至手写剧本转换为NFT的兴趣日益增加。2021年11月初,昆汀塔伦蒂诺 (Quentin Tarantino) 宣布计划出售电影 《低俗小说》(Pulp Fiction)的原版手写剧本。然而,就在几天之内,这部电影的制片人米拉麦克斯影业 (Miramax) 就以违反合同、侵犯版权和商标为由提起了诉讼。尽管有关艺术品模糊的所有权以及相关知识产权的问题可能已经威胁到了其他一些NFTs的发行,但该等纠纷对于行业与NFTs的进一步联动发展而言可谓恰逢其时。

与此同时,NFTs的交易也面临着挑战。2021年5月12日,一名原告起诉了Dapper Labs, Inc. (下称「Dapper」) 及其首席执行官,指称Dapper因在其交易平台NBA Top Shot出售NFTs而违反证券法。原告认为,由于NFTs是「从一个特定的项目、发起人或初创企业的成功或失败中获得其价值 (derive their value from the success or failure of a given project, promoter, or start-up)」的数字资产,NFTs应当在美国证券交易委员会进行登记。目前法院尚未对Dapper一案作出判决,但这一具有里程碑意义的案件预计将为NFT交易的当事人提供有用的指引,甚至为香港证券条例的监管范围提供参考。

结论

在过去一年,NFTs在全球范围内受到了前所未有的欢迎和关注。相信在不久的将来,NFTs与合同和知识产权法之间的相互作用会继续增多,NFTs在各行业的应用会继续扩大,而对NFTs市场的投资也会继续增加。

在这个关键时刻,各个司法管辖区的监管机构有可能会对加密货币资产提供进一步的监管,并就加密货币的法律地位提供指引。同时,投资者和公众在评估和投资NFTs时应更加谨慎并做好尽职调查。

本文由本所合伙人,诉讼及争议解决部主管徐凯怡律师黄晊晄律师撰写。若阁下想了解更多详情,请联络本所徐凯怡律师 (heidi.chui@sw-hk.com)。

于本文中提供的一切资料仅供参考,不构成任何法律意见,资料亦受制于适用规定及法例不时的更新与修改。若需取得相关法律意见,须咨询法律顾问。

19 Nov 2021

(中文) 合伙人徐凯怡律师受邀为广东省粤港澳合作促进会座谈会担任主持及演讲嘉宾

(中文) 2021年11月19日, 本所合伙人,诉讼及争议解决部主管兼广东省粤港澳合作促进会第一届法律专业委员会副秘书长、香港女律师协会现任理事- 徐凯怡律师,受邀为「比较中华人民共和国和香港特区合同法及商业仲裁法」担任主持及演讲嘉宾。

本次在线座谈会由广东省粤港澳合作促进会法律专业委员香港区主办, ACIA华人内部审计师公会和香港女律师协会共同协办,并吸引了超过1200名人士报名参加。


左起:香港女律师协会主席曾妙儿律师、广东省粤港澳合作促进会法律专业委员会委员何文琪律师、本所合伙人,诉讼及争议解决部主管徐凯怡律师和华人内部审计师公会会长徐惠祥博士

随着400多名香港律师取得在粤港澳大湾区内地九市执业资格,香港律师及大湾区企业需特别注意内地合同法及商业仲裁法有别于香港普通法。徐律师在会上阐释了香港的仲裁司法体系以及香港法院在其担当之角色, 并就内地与香港签订的司法互助安排之《两地仲裁保全安排》之要点进行了分享与讨论。

本次座谈会成果丰硕,本所期待日后与华人内部审计师公会和香港女律师协会在不同领域中合作。


左起: 华人内部审计师公会副会长刘嘉明先生、本所合伙人徐凯怡律师、华人内部审计师公会荣誉顾问周荣生先生和华人内部审计师公会会长徐惠祥博士

若阁下想了解更多详情,请联络本所合伙人徐凯怡律师(heidichui.office@sw-hk.com)。

18 Nov 2021

Stevenson, Wong & Co. Ranked as Top 5 Largest Domestic Law Firms in ALB Asia 2021

Asian Legal Business (ALB) published their recent findings of Asia’s Top 50 Law Firms on 18 November 2021. We are pleased to announce that our firm has been listed as the top 5th largest Hong Kong domestic law firm for 6 consecutive years.

Established in 1978, Stevenson, Wong & Co. has more than 170 experienced lawyers and staff. Our aim is to provide clients with innovative and effective solutions for their personal or commercial problems with our local and international expertise.

We would also like to take this opportunity to congratulate our association firm, AllBright Law Offices, for being ranked as the top 5th largest domestic law firm across Asia.

About ALB and Asia Top 50
ALB is a leading law journal published by Thomson Reuters and is considered as one of the most influential legal media in Asia. ALB’s Asia Top 50 aims to identify and rank the largest law firms across Asia by their size and number of lawyers.

For the full ranking, please click here.

Please contact us for any enquiries or further information.

NEWER OLDER 1 2 61 62 63 193 194