News Updates

Find out all about our firm’s latest news updates below. To learn more about any individual item, please contact us here.

1 Feb 2018

Stevenson, Wong & Co.’s Family Department Won Several Awards

Stevenson, Wong & Co. is delighted to announce 3 awards, a testament to the excellence and territory wide recognition of our Family Department.

First, our Family Department has been selected as the winner of “Family – Law Firm of the Year – Hong Kong” in Lawyer Monthly Legal Awards 2017

Secondly, we have been awarded “Family Mediation Law Firm of the Year in Hong Kong 2018” by Corporate INTL. Corporate Intl Magazine Global Award which commemorates those who have been successful over the past 12 months and who have shown excellence not only in expertise but in service.

Thirdly, our Family Department has again been recognized for its success and dedication in the legal industry by being awarded as “Family Law Firm of the Year – Hong Kong” in Corporate USA Today Annual Awards 2018 and Lawyer International – Legal 100 2018 Awards.

Stevenson, Wong & Co has one of the leading family law practices in Hong Kong with over 40 years of experience. The practice has grown and become a significant part of a developing Private Client department which uniquely also provides wealth protection and succession planning, estates and trusts, Committee work, wealth and asset management, all under one roof. Our teams are dedicated and aim to provide effective and practical solutions and support to people going through changes in their family circumstances. We have expertise in dealing with all aspects of contentious and non-contentious family matters. We also deal with cases with an international element, whether they relate to children or finances. We regularly help clients with PRC issues.

We also offer and promote mediation as an alternative dispute resolution procedure. We regularly conduct mediations for a variety of family issues with a high success rate. We are dedicated to the use of alternative dispute resolution in litigation, providing assistance to parties to reach a mutually agreed settlement in a timely and flexible manner.

Our Succession planning and estates practice group, in addition to assisting our clients with the preparation of wills, succession planning and the handling of probate applications, works closely with our family team to assist separating parties in wealth protection. We handle financial and maintenance claims of family and dependants against the estate of deceased persons. We offer advice and help resolve financial disputes involving complex issues, substantial assets or complicated company and trust structures

As well as with SW Trustee, we also work closely with international trust corporations to establish trusts to meet the needs of our domestic and international clients.

Committee Work is a growing area in Hong Kong and we are experienced in handling applications under Part II of the Mental Health Ordinance, advising Committees and acting as a Professional Committee appointed by the Court of First Instance.

Please contact Ms. Catherine Por for any enquiries or further information.

24 Jan 2018

Stevenson, Wong & Co. Won “Business Law Firm of the Year – China” at the Corporate LiveWire Legal Awards 2017/18

Stevenson, Wong & Co. is delighted to announce that we have been awarded “Business Law Firm of the Year – China” at Corporate LiveWire Legal Awards 2017/18. Each award nominee is carefully examined, with the judging panel taking into account their performance over the past 12 months to ensure that only the most deserving firms are handed one of the trophies.

About The Firm
Founded in 1978, Stevenson, Wong & Co. (SW) is a forward-looking, full-service law firm. The firm is ranked fifth among all Hong Kong domestic firms in the Top 50 research of Asian Legal Business. SW provides services including Banking & Finance, Corporate Finance/Capital Markets, China Practice, Corporate Commercial Law and Corporate Services, Employment Law, Family Law and Private Clients, Immigration, Intellectual Property, Litigation & Disputes Resolution, Media and Entertainment Law, Property, Regulatory Enforcement and Technology and Communications. SW has a strategic association with AllBright Law Offices, one of the nation’s largest full service law firms. SW is also a founding member of INTERLAW, an international association. Through our membership in INTERLAW and our association with AllBright, clients are assured of the same personal, open-minded and highly effective approach delivered by our lawyers in Hong Kong and China.

Please contact Mr. Hank Lo for any enquiries or further information.

18 Jan 2018

HKEX Consultation Conclusions on the New Board Concept Paper

Introduction

On 15 December 2017, Hong Kong Exchange and Clearing Limited (“HKEX”) published the Consultation Conclusions on the New Board Concept Paper.  Instead of creating a stand-alone board, the conclusions confirmed the previous “signals” to drop the plan and adopt an alternative by adding new chapters to the listing rules to welcome issuers from the emerging and innovative sectors.  The reform will benefit weighted voting rights (“WVR”) companies, pre-revenue Biotech companies and also overseas issuers pursuing a secondary listing. 

HKEX is in the process of finalising the details of the proposals, and has started drafting the proposed amendments to the Rules Governing the Listing of Securities on The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited (the “Main Board Listing Rules”).  Formal consultations on the rule amendments are expected in the first quarter of 2018.

Highlights: Proposed Way Forward

  • HKEX to extend the existing listing regime to allow the listing of:
  • issuers from emerging and innovative sectors that have WVR structures with a minimum expected market capitalisation of HK$10 billion at the time of listing; and
  • pre-revenue Biotech issuers with a minimum expected market capitalisation at the time of listing of HK$1.5 billion.
  • HKEX to create a new concessionary secondary listing route, to attract overseas issuers, especially issuers with a “centre of gravity” in Greater China (“Greater China Companies”), from emerging and innovative sectors that have a primary listing on either the NYSE, NASDAQ or on the “premium listing” segment of the LSE’s Main Market
  • HKEX to issue a guidance letter on the characteristics to be used for defining “innovative” companies to provide guidance to the market.  The guidance letter would be applicable to issuers with WVR structures or issuers going for the new concessionary secondary listing route.

Issuers with a WVR Structure

HKEX proposes to allow the listing of high growth and innovative companies with WVR structures.  The main entry requirements are set out below:

Entry Requirements for Issuers with a WVR Structure

Financial Requirements

  • has a minimum expected market capitalisation of HK$10 billion
  • if below HK$40 billion of market capitalisation, meets higher revenue test of HK$1 billion in the most recent audited financial year

Eligibility and Suitability Requirements

  • Success – has a track record of high business growth as measured by operations, users, customers, unit sales, revenue, profits, market value, etc., with a continuing trajectory
  • Nature – fits the definition of an “innovative” company (please refer to the section “Definition of ‘New Economy’” below)
  • Contribution of WVR Holders – each WVR holder must have been materially responsible for the growth by way of skills, knowledge or strategic directions
  • Responsibility of WVR Holders – each WVR holder must have an active executive role and assume the role of directors at the time of listing
  • External Validation – issuer must have received meaningful third party funding from sophisticated investors, who must retain 50 percent of their investment at time of listing for at least six months after the IPO
  • Eligibility and Suitability requirements will be evaluated on a principled basis, and satisfaction of above characteristics on superficial basis will not automatically ensure suitability for listing
  • HKEX may reject issuers with extreme case of non-conformance with governance norms (e.g. ordinary shares with zero voting rights)

Safeguards

  • Issuers must have suitable shareholder’s protection mechanisms (please refer to the box “Safeguards over WVR” below)

Since companies with WVR structures potentially carry additional risks to investors, the following safeguards will be put in place (note that this WVR safeguards are mostly exempted if the issuers are eligible in the concessional secondary listing route discussed below):

Safeguards over WVR

  • Ring-fencing:

Only new applicants may list with a WVR structure.  After listing, issuers will be prohibited from increasing the proportion of WVR in issue or issue more WVR shares.

  • Eligible persons only:

Beneficiaries of WVR will be restricted to those who are directors of the issuer.  The WVR attached to a beneficiary’s shares will lapse permanently if he (i) ceases to be a director; (ii) dies or is incapacitated; or (iii) if the shares are transferred to another person.  WVR holders will also be subject to a minimum equity threshold at IPO.

  • Limits on WVR powers:

The rights attached to WVR shares and ordinary shares must be the same in all aspects other than voting rights, and the voting power attached to WVR shares must be capped to not more than 10 times of the ordinary shares.  Non-WVR shareholders must hold at least 10% of the votes eligible to be cast at general meeting.  Certain key governance matters are to be determined on a “one-share, one-vote” basis.

  • Enhanced disclosures:

Appropriate warnings will be included in the issuer’s corporate communications.  The listing documents must contain warning language and a full description of the issuer’s WVR structure, rationale and associated risks must be disclosed.

  • Enhanced corporate governance:

Issuers with a WVR structure are required to have a corporate governance committee consisting of independent non-executive directors.  A compliance advisor is also required to be engaged on a permanent basis.

  • Constitutional backing:

The prescribed safeguards must be incorporated into the issuer’s constitutional documents to allow private legal actions taken against breach of the safeguards.

  • Anti-avoidance and Enforcement:

Anti-avoidance provisions will be added to the Main Board Listing Rules to prevent the circumvention of the prescribed WVR safeguards.  A breach of the WVR safeguards to be built into the Main Board Listing Rules by WVR issuers will be enforced in the same way as any other breach of the Main Board Listing Rules by any listed issuer.

Listing of Pre-revenue Biotech Issuers

To widen market access, HKEX proposes to facilitate the listing of pre-revenue new economy companies, but this would be limited to Biotech issuers for the time being.  Pre-revenue biotech issuers should meet the following requirements:

Entry Requirements for Pre-revenue Biotech Issuers

  • has a minimum expected market capitalisation of HK$1.5 billion
  • essentially engages in research and development (“R&D”) to develop new and innovative products, processes and technologies
  • has unique features of innovation or intellectual property that reasonably expected to give rise to commercialisable patents, copyrights, etc.
  • has at least one product, process or technology beyond the concept stage
  • has as its primary reason for listing the raising of funds for R&D to commercialise its products, processes or technologies
  • has a portfolio of durable patents, registered patents
  • has previously received investment from at least one sophisticated investor (including financial institutions)
  • meets the enhanced working capital requirements (125% of the issuer’s current requirement over the next 12 months)
  • has two years’ record of operations in the current business
  • provides enhanced risk disclosures to inform investors of the business and R&D risks
  • meets the minimum initial public float requirement for listing (i.e. 25%) without taking into account the shares held by cornerstone investors

HKEX will continue to look at whether other types of new economy companies may also be permitted to list under the pre-revenue regime.

Concessionary Route to Secondary Listing

HKEX aims to widen the market for secondary listings by creating a new concessionary route for secondary listing requirements in addition to the existing route currently in the Main Board Listing Rules and the 2013 Joint Policy Statement (“2013 JPS”).  The new concessionary route targets overseas issuers from emerging and innovative sectors that have a primary listing on a Qualifying Exchange (as defined below).  Greater China Companies, currently not allowed to secondary list with HKEX, will be able to apply through the new concessionary route for secondary listing as long as it satisfies the relevant requirements.

Issuers satisfying the requirements below may consider a secondary listing on the new concessional route:

Entry Requirements for the Concessional Secondary Listing Route

  • has a minimum expected market capitalisation of HK$10 billion
  • if below HK$40 billion of market capitalisation and with a WVR structure and/or a centre of gravity in Greater China (as defined in the 2013 JPS), meets higher revenue test of HK$1 billion in the most recent audited financial year
  • fits the definition of an “innovative” company (please refer to the section “Definition of ‘New Economy’” below)
  • is primary listed on a Qualifying Exchange (Either a Recognised US Exchange (e.g. the NYSE and NASDAQ) or the “premium listing” segment of the LSE’s Main Market)
  • has two years’ record of good compliance

In light of the above, HKEX has classified companies seeking secondary listings in Hong Kong into three categories:

  • Grandfathered Greater China Companies – Greater China Companies that are primary listed on a Qualifying Exchange on or before the publication of the Consultation Conclusions
  • Non-Grandfathered Greater China Companies – Greater China Companies that are primary listed on a Qualifying Exchange after the Consultation Conclusions
  • Non-Greater China Companies – Companies that are not Greater China Companies

Equivalence Requirement
It will not be necessary for Grandfathered Greater China Companies and Non-Greater China Companies to demonstrate Hong Kong equivalent shareholders protection standards (“Equivalence Requirements”) by amending constitutional documents.  They will only be required to comply with the Key Shareholder Protection Standards set out in the 2013 JPS (which will be written into the Main Board Listing Rules), such as a super-majority vote of members required to approve of fundamental matters, and issuers must hold an AGM at least every 15 months.

WVR Structures
Furthermore, both Grandfathered Greater China Companies and Non-Greater China Companies with a WVR structure are eligible to be secondary listed in Hong Kong without the need to change their WVR structures or meet the proposed WVR safeguards (as set out in the section “Issuers with a WVR Structure” above), apart from disclosure requirements.

Non-Grandfathered Greater China Companies
Non-Grandfathered Greater China Companies will not be granted concessions regarding Equivalence Requirements and WVR Structures granted to Grandfathered Greater China companies and Non-Greater China companies

The requirements for the three types of potential candidates under the concessional secondary listing route are briefly summarised as follows:

 

Grandfathered Greater China Companies AND Non-Greater China Companies

Non-Grandfathered
Greater China
Companies

Shareholder protection standards

Required to comply with the Key Shareholder Protection Standards (to be written into the Main Board Listing Rules)

Required to change constitutional documents (as necessary) to meet equivalent standards

WVR structures
(if applicable)

No need to meet WVR safeguards nor change WVR structure to meet primary listing requirements

Must meet WVR safeguards and WVR structure must conform with primary listing requirements

Definition of “New Economy”

At present, HKEX considers that an “innovative” company would normally contain more than one of the following characteristics:

  • has been successful due to the application of new technologies, innovations, or business models in the core business
  • has R&D as a significant contributor to value and also as a major activity and cause of expense
  • has had its success demonstrably attributable to unique features of innovation / intellectual property
  • has an outsized market capitalisation or intangible asset value relative to tangible value

HKEX proposes to issue a guidance letter on the characteristics to be used for defining “innovative” companies to provide guidance to the market, as opposed to putting in place a fixed definition.

Implications

The question of dual class shares and pre-revenue companies have been contentious issues, being intricately tied with HKEX’s initiatives in maintaining competitiveness compared to other prominent exchanges.  Many market players have long anticipated a way forward for the issue, and may have wished that the regulators lead the market to a broad consensus sooner rather than later.

Nevertheless, the blueprint just released sets out a robust framework and is in many ways a commendable effort.  HKEX has taken a measured approach in drawing out the parameters of the initial target companies, which is appropriate, as balancing market development and shareholders’ protection has always been a challenge in Hong Kong.

A consensual framework that works to make Hong Kong a realistic listing venue for new economy companies while giving the regulators a suitably firm grip on the reins will always be a difficult task.  With this encouraging first step towards liberalisation, we look forward to seeing our market grow in prosperity and diversity.

This newsletter is for information purposes only.  Its content does not constitute legal advice, and should not be treated as such.  Stevenson, Wong & Co. will not be liable to you in respect of any special, indirect or consequential loss or damage.

Please contact our Eric Lui or Rodney Teoh for any enquiries or further information.

23 Dec 2017

We are delighted to announce that Stevenson, Wong & Co. have been recognized as “Excellence in Litigation & Dispute Resolution – Hong Kong” in APAC Insider Business Excellence Awards 2017. The APAC Business Excellence program is launched to recognize the very best companies operating in the Asia-Pacific. Our active litigation and dispute resolution department has decades of experience in all aspects of commercial and general litigation and alternative disputes resolution. Staffed by a team of seasoned practitioners, we never litigate for the sake of it. Our team combines insightful analysis of each case with proactive advice on other issues that may arise during the resolution process. Please contact Ms. Heidi Chui for any enquiries or further information. 

We are delighted to announce that Stevenson, Wong & Co. have been recognized as “Excellence in Litigation & Dispute Resolution – Hong Kong” in APAC Insider Business Excellence Awards 2017. The APAC Business Excellence program is launched to recognize the very best companies operating in the Asia-Pacific.

Our active litigation and dispute resolution department has decades of experience in all aspects of commercial and general litigation and alternative disputes resolution. Staffed by a team of seasoned practitioners, we never litigate for the sake of it. Our team combines insightful analysis of each case with proactive advice on other issues that may arise during the resolution process.

Please contact Ms. Heidi Chui for any enquiries or further information. 

28 Nov 2017

(中文) 与其等待美国税改,可以主动创造低税区税籍吗?

(中文) 优惠的税收政策有助吸引境外投资者,特朗普税改是为了实现竞选承诺还是纸上谈兵?不管美国税改是否成功,CRS的执行都会加大中国税改的力度,现在是大数据云计算的时代了,你还在执行石器时代的税务规划方案吗?

特朗普在就职演说中提出:“真正重要的不是谁来执掌我们的政府,而是我们的政府是否民有?” 有人说税改只是博个噱头,来讨好中产阶级精英,挽救特朗普低迷的支持率;也有说这是个套路,前提是美国财政收入不崩盘,希望减少企业负担,提高美国的投资吸引力;更多人认为美国税改根本是不可能实现的玩意。

美国税改简介
为大家划出了税改法案的两个重点:
1.个人所得税:原有的7档简化为3档-分别是12%,25%,35%
2.企业所得税:联邦企业所得税税率从35%调降至15%(加上地方所得税,综合税率为20%左右)。并实行属地征收原则。

美国是世界上最大的经济体。如果税改考虑不够细致,某“税务优惠”就可以引发其他阶层的不满。必须平衡各方利益,还需要考虑财务健康的持续性与对长远经济发展的影响。

正因如此,税改最终是否能通过国会,估计美国政府还要提出更多数据,包括税改如何改变不同工薪阶层的收入,创造额外就业职位以及加大企业投资意向等。当然,最近容许加大财政赤字的法案通过,增大了黑天鹅事件发生的可能。

赴美投资需要同时办移民吗?
中国企业家的行动往往是迅速的: 美国税改的消息加上CRS的实施导致近月更多人士考虑赴美投资,其中包括投资当地房产。但以现行美国税务法规来说,投资美国房产,不管投资者的国籍与居住地,已经产生美国增值税和遗产税等问题。对于另一些准备利用美国技术和人才的企业主,会加速设立美国研发中心或其他企业主体,我们看到有些虽然项目资金还没到位,但企业主已开始申请绿卡。长远家人在美国定居,逐步把重心转移。

请记住: 个人身份筹划是有多个考虑因素。无疑现在这份减税计划非常吸引,但很多细节还没确定。由于美国纳税人定义是绿卡持有者(不管居住地);或者没有绿卡,也会按照非常有限的居留时间来认定是否全球所得征税。所以在美国进行投资的客户,不但不应该急着办理绿卡,更要算好在美国的逗留时间,投资与身份筹划不是必然划上等号。

资产代持问题多多,创造合理避税条件从改变税籍开始
美国财政部及国税局披露:2016年放弃美国籍高达5411人,连续4年刷新记录。如果包含放弃永久居民权人士,数字应该更高。除了避免沉重的税负及复杂的资产申报,也为了可以拥有更多海外金融投资的机会(因为海外金融机构都不愿意增加配合美国税务监管的合规成本而放弃服务美国客户)。 我们遇到的客户早年没做规范的美国税务申报,现有需要加大美国投资,才发现需要请律师协助梳理资产来源,罚款滞纳金与违法后果严重。

目前为止,国内移民申请者请税务专家做登陆前规划是非常少的。更多是执行民间偏方,通过资产转移亲属代持来解决。但这样只会产生更多问题与风险,包括以后的税务合规与继承问题。

试想一下:如果你的资产转移父母代持是因为逃避美国税务申报,父母去世后,你的兄弟姐妹宣称这是父母遗产,相信你是不敢否认维权的。或者到时中国有遗产税,税金也没有准备好,需要“放弃继承”自己辛苦赚来的资产,也太可笑了吧?中国投资人在没有了解美国综合税负与规划方向,贸然成为美国税务居民是危险的。

美国在2015年实施13项工程里面就提到要打击海外逃税项目:企图把绿卡持有者的境外金融账户和离岸公司账户一网打尽。肥咖法案的实施当然是重要的配套设施了。不要忘记现在是大数据云计算的时代了,所有的生活环节,包括消费,银行转账,打车,定位等都留有痕迹,随着新手机与无人店的出台,掌握你指纹,头像等生物识别的机构只会愈来愈多,加上个税,社保,资产等的大数据一起联网,查税是不用专管员坐在你面前的!

从税收方向筹划个人身份,香港是好选择吗?
美国是税法执行力度很大的高税区,在每州财政情况不一样的情况下如何改革为低税区我们拭目以待。但一定要记住美国是两党轮替的民选国家,减税的政策稳定性是不确定的。

与个人有关的税种一般分为个人所得税,增值税及遗产税等 。三者之间,以增值税与遗产税后果更为严重。而遗产税又往往与赠与税挂钩。这些税种都是偏向属人也属地的。所以,从个人税务筹划的角度而言,香港,新加坡这种少数属地税收政策,各方面生活设施齐备的发达地区是理想的身份或居住地选择。

预期等待不确定的美国税改,要不我们聚焦看看本来就是低税地的香港:香港遗产税在2006年已经带头取消,意味与传承关系最密切的那一把刀已经没有了。香港个人所得税率累进最高为17%,企业所得税率为16.5%,远低于中国或美国。最近香港特首建议企业200万利润内的所得税从还要降低至8.25%,为中国企业走向国际提供更优惠的平台。

虽然香港已经取消了投资移民政策,不等于打算发展境外业务的中国企业主不可以申请输入内地人才计划定居香港的。相对其他国家,获得香港永久居民身份的居住要求相对比较弹性。由于香港的特别地位,对于在中国有业务,取得香港身份后需要常驻大陆的中国企业主,也不用像其他国家护照持有者一样,只能以商务/工作签证有期限逗留中国。

香港的司法独立性与金融中心地位是世界前列的。选用香港公司建立国际品牌,扩张自己商业帝国同时获取低税地身份,提供税收筹划的空间,这或许是个两全其美的方法。香港移民政策也是逐步收紧,建议想设立香港公司同时安排税籍的客户尽快做好安排,我们可以与有大学学历的有兴趣人士讨论方案。

对于高资产净值人士来说,家庭成员的居住地与国籍安排是非常重要的,当中如涉及高税区国家,移民申请前的合理避税筹划更是刚需。如需了解更多身份税务筹划方案,请联系你的税务律师/家族办公室。史蒂文生黄律师事务所成立了香港及新西兰信托公司,可为客户提供信托咨询或受托人服务。且曾荣获香港家族办公室协会颁发“最具特色家族海外信托策划服务奖”。

分享资讯助人自助,谢谢关注微信公众号或浏览官方网站www.sw-hk.com。如需节录或转载,请注明资料来源为微信公众号swc_hk。

免责声明: 于此提供的资料只供参考,须以有关国家/地区法律顾问的法律意见和有关政府行政与司法机关对于适用的法例的解释和应用为准;上述资料亦受制于适用法例不时的更新与修改,如因上述资料而引至任何人士或单位蒙受损失,该人士或单位须自行承担一切责任。

22 Nov 2017

Stevenson, Wong & Co. Highly Recommended in Asialaw Profiles 2018

Stevenson, Wong & Co. (SW) is delighted to announce that Asialaw Profiles has once again recognized SW as a “Highly Recommended Law Firm” in 6 categories, including Banking & Finance, Capital Markets, Corporate/M&A, Dispute Resolution & Litigation, Financial Services Regulatory, and Restructuring & Insolvency. SW has also been recognized as a “Recommended Law Firm” for Construction & Real Estate.

Asialaw Profile rankings provide a guide to Asia-Pacific’s leading domestic and regional law firms. It is researched, written and edited by a team of journalists based in the region. It is a good reference for both the legal industry and businesses.

About The Firm
Founded in 1978, Stevenson, Wong & Co. (SW) is a forward-looking, full-service law firm. The firm is ranked fifth among all Hong Kong domestic firms in the Top 50 research of Asian Legal Business. SW provides services including Banking & Finance, Corporate Finance/Capital Markets, China Practice, Corporate Commercial Law and Corporate Services, Employment Law, Family Law and Private Clients, Immigration, Intellectual Property, Litigation & Disputes Resolution, Media and Entertainment Law, Property, Regulatory Enforcement and Technology and Communications. SW has a strategic association with AllBright Law Offices, one of the nation’s largest full service law firms. SW is also a founding member of INTERLAW, an international association. Through our membership in INTERLAW and our association with AllBright, clients are assured of the same personal, open-minded and highly effective approach delivered by our lawyers in Hong Kong and China.

Please contact Mr. Eric Lui for any enquiries or further information.

NEWER OLDER 1 2 71 72 73 78 79